oakwcj
Well-known member
RonDawg said:mwalsh said:RonDawg said:As best as I can remember, the letter that everybody is talking about (that also talks about the software enhancement), and the "Notice of Proposed Settlement" came to me in one envelope. I found them together in my rather unorganized pile of stuff, so that's why I don't think I got them in two separate mailings.
mwalsh...don't get pissed off at me. I'm just telling you what I got in the mail, and presume everybody else did too. I'm not the one who advised you (or anybody else) to opt-out.
So can I suggest then, since you are completely misremembering everything that transpired, that you have nothing further of substance to add to this conversation. Because, frankly, I also find your borderline smugness over YOUR decision to be offensive too. Oh, and by the way, bully for you!
And how do YOU know that I got the mailings separately (like you say you did)? Are you the one that mailed them from Nissan NA? Are you the USPS worker who mailed them to my house?
Don't blame me for making a decision that you are now regretting. Speaking of which, I found the Opt-out thread in which you said you were going to consult with an attorney and requested that others hold off until you got an answer from him or her. Perhaps this is the person to whom you should be directing your anger.
Going through that thread, it appears that people had doubts even then (September 2013) as to whether or not you would retain the warranty if you opted-out.
Since you have located the thread, why don't you take a few minutes to read Alex Kozinski's objection, which sets out all the relevant facts and timelines in clear and simple English. If you do that, you won't continue to say that the warranty modification mailed by Nissan in June 2013, came in the same envelope as the notice of settlement mailed by the plaintiffs' attorneys in August 2013, pursuant to the order of the judge. The only reason Nissan is now trying to pretend that the warranty modification is somehow tied to the settlement is that they got caught red-handed. If they were related, Nissan wouldn't be honoring the warranty now, because there is no approved settlement. If they admit that they are unrelated, it becomes even clearer that the plaintiffs' attorneys sold out the class for their own financial benefit.