@SageBrush
Yes, to what you said about certain risks and how you're so right about knowing what you're getting into. The nature of this granular journey is not typical (at present / ever?). For the typical journey, I would think spend $4K to $7k more and get a used Bolt under warranty. This is just a different way to go which could pay off, and could go South. How South? That's the nature or strategic risk assessment.
@GaleHawkins: I'm suggesting that even in the United States (and maybe with a little love that we send upwards to our amazing neighbours), it could really make sense to have a car with 200+ mile range for well under $11k when managed well noting the risks.
1. Consumer Protection: I used a high quality credit card that would protect me and that gave me the confidence to do the first part of the gamble, the purchase of the battery itself.
2. Seller Confidence: The salvage yard that sold me the battery felt right after speaking the seller as he had two kind of overlapping warranties for me; the battery itself over a short period of time, and the offer to either refund or replace the battery if it arrived damaged.
3. Understanding the gamble parameters: Nonetheless, I knew this was an $8k or so gamble, that had two sorts of defining issues past the original purchase with it:
a. if -- the car gets totaled, I'm out most of that $8k because the value of a 2011 is quite low, unless,
b. the battery is salvageable in some way -- then it could be an even sort of exchange (minus labour costs, i.e., another $1000 to $1300 re-installation into another donor shell plus the hassle of finding that shell -- though craigslist in Ventura and Los Angeles County daily show pretty good deals on those).
4. Repair: Installer and my local mechanic can do most of the repairs for me; I'm not sure what a dealer could do at this point that he or my regular mechanic (brakes, fluid changes) couldn't do.
5. Value over time: Like you, I like to think about probability structures, and this one grocked right as every year the car lives (happy future birthday) its value sort of inversely grows to the risk (the ratio changes in your favour significantly). That is sort of the general formula of driving a car into the ground. So let's call this a data point, in an early stage that has no great 'n' (number of observations) behind it. That to me is a really strong argument you make; and one that sort of appreciates the distinctions and overlap between case study and large scale observations.
6. Overall risk in contexts of risks: I sort of like the cheapskate gamble structure that is well thought out; sometimes you lose; in this case though, you're the house, and you usually win when you've done your research. And to your point, you have to live with your losses in the scheme of your wins over time.
7. Business Model concerns for 1 stop shop: Dala is so thoughtful and if that's the video you were referring to where he explained that he was his price structure just wasn't cutting it to make it work, that really gets to the variables that sometimes change, i.e., price of 40 kWh + batteries). I think in someways Dala is a kind of ambassador into the future. I know I will keep supporting what he does in the hopes that that investment on his part will lead to significant financial rewards for him down the road.
Here are pictures of how my Leaf station wagon with cheapo racks functions on a daily basis. It's so fugly, and I love it!
Aloha and Mahalo!