adric22 said:
Herm said:
a couple reviews mentioned that it was a bit on the cheap side.. apparently everyone has different preferences.. some will go for the Mitsubishi others will go for the Tesla. Once prices drop by about $7500 and the rebate goes away then you start to compete with ICE costs.
Yeah - I don't personally like the Mitsubishi. Granted, if it were the only EV on the market, I'd probably buy one. But I love the high tech feel of the Leaf and the looks of the vehicle. I think Mitsubishi's EV just looks dorky on the outside, and low-tech on the inside.
+1!!
the Prius has become iconic with its role in the automotive industry and it has only a "little" to do with its dominance in the hybrid field. the real claim to fame is their marketing strategy.
they started with putting money into the technology to get it right. so the first Priuses were sold starting at $19,995 and Toyota was widely criticized for selling the Prius at a loss. Well, the price got people in the door. it was only a few thousand more than a regular car but had a HUGE leap in technology. but it was plasticly. that was a point emphasized by other manufacturers like GM. that will come back to haunt GM big time
but the Prius was cheap enough that most of the masses could get one. then word of mouth sold the car.
fast forward to today; the Prius is not cheap. average packages run in the high 20's but still sell based on the reputation built by earlier sales. now Toyota is adding quality opts for a premium price because now the consumer accepts it. the Prius has a track record, fanboi's named Consumer's Report and Motor Trend, etc.
so, now they are looked at as a option next to a BMW. naturally the Prius is not a BMW in luxury, comfort, etc. but it now has equal value in technology and reliability. so what we have is not a great tech innovation (although it most def quailifies as one!) what we have is one of the greatest marketing campaigns of all time.
Nissan saw this like the rest of the world and instead of chiding Toyota, they emulated it instead. they started out with their iconic technology, the Leaf.
here they too concentrated on the technology and it starts again. "too plasticly" not enough glitter "can't hear the bells" etc. but at the same time, they were able to introduce a car that comes in at the mid to high 20's along with the promise that many will save up to $1000 a year in transpo costs. (the tier one states, EV highway project, etc insures initial word of mouth comes from many who have super cheap electricity (WA, OR, TN) or large percentage of solar (CA, AZ) so again GM whines that Nissan is selling Leafs at a loss.
but the Leaf is a near perfect combination of comfort and size (nearly identical to the Prius) but with the cutting edge tech.
now, granted the tech has had hiccups and Nissan partnering with other companies to provide Carwings, GPS ,etc could have been done better, but i will say that after 10 months of Leaf ownership, there is very little i would change.
i dont want a bigger battery pack because i do not want to pay for it. simple as that. i can make do and have been doing just fine, thank you very much!!
i dont want a quicker home charger because i dont want to pay for that either. 3.3 or 6.6?? like what for?? so my overnight charging is done at 1 am instead of 4 am, like i am supposed to want to pay for that?? umm..., like...
PASS!!
besides 6.6 is not gonna work in public. now 80% in 30 minutes. ok, i can see that and i will pay for that (at least they gave me discount for QC port. free would be better but i am persecuted for being a renter...can i file a discrimination suit on that?) not that i would use it a lot, but i do see where it could come in handy.
i have tracked every mile driven since nov 2003. i average about 10-15 trips a year the Leaf could not do. But when QC is implemented if implemented as planned, i could do about 8 of those trips (to Salem, OR) making the Prius just about a commuter only car (which is 92% of its role now)
as far as the Focus; mistake. too much money, no track record for Ford in the technology, only have bleeding edge adopters which at $35,000 is a pretty small market.
GM; in 8 months when sales figures are compared against the Plug in Pri...well enough on that.
iMEV; cant diss a brother EV with QC too much. i think they will have a permanent market in the lower end EV commuter only segment. i also think they would do much better by lowering the price $1500-2000