GRA
Well-known member
B (&C). 1250/67 mpge (Mirai EPA) x $14 = $261.19. Of course, no customer's paying that at the moment so effectively their only cost is the value of their time, but all concerned know that H2 has to come down in price for H2 to be competitive with gas/diesel or electricity.TonyWilliams said:The concept that a quick charge electric vehicle would somehow be more expensive to operate than either a hydrogen car or any gasoline car is just not correct. It's easy to say, but just as easy to disapprove, as I have done several times already in this thread.
Currently, today, quick charging is available from both Tesla and other sites for free. But let's use just the fee for use method to compare with 1250 miles per month:
A) NRG / eVgo chargers at 40kW average with a Nissan LEAF with average consumption of 4 miles per kilowatt hour in the city.
B) Toyota hydrogen car that travels 50 miles per kilogram of hydrogen and costs $14 per kilogram
C) The tried and true Toyota Prius that travels 50 miles per gallon with gasoline at three dollars per gal.
*****
A) $14.95 monthly fee plus $1.50 per 15 minute charge session that will provide 10kWh, or 40 miles range. Cost for 1250 miles is ((1250 / 40) * $1.50) + $14.95, then 1250 miles divided by $61.83 per month using ONLY public fee-for-service for 15 minutes daily = $0.0495 per mile
B)
C)
You haven't included the value of people's time in your calcs, and on average, people value their commute time at about 1/2 their equivalent hourly wage. Assuming someone makes $40k/yr or about $20/hour, they value their time at $10/hr. If you have to charge 5 times a week (ignoring the weekends) for 15 minutes each, that's another $12.50 per week, or $50/month, for a total of $111.83 ; add $13.33/month if you charge all weekend days as well, for a total of $125.16.
If we assume an average time to fuel an FCEV as 10 minutes instead of 5, and do so four times a month, that's only $6.67/month, a savings of $43.33 to $56.66 in time compared to QC'ing. The more you earn the more your time is worth, and the more you save with fast refueling.
C. 1250 miles/50 mpg Prius = 25 gallons x $3.00/gal. = $75.00 + (3? x 10 min/month x $10/hr = $5.00) = $80.00/month. The HEV clearly wins on the basis of cost and convenience for anyone who doesn't have convenient charging.
No AFV (other than at-home charged BEVs with ToU, or net metering with PV, and possibly excepting HEVs) makes financial sense given current U.S. gas prices (you used $3.00/gal.; I just paid $2.50/gal. a couple of days ago, and it's since dropped to $2.46), and at the moment we know of no for-profit QC network that is profitable, including eVgo (as mentioned in an article linked in a previous post). What remains to be seen is how much the costs can be reduced in future, so that charging and/or H2 become profitable here, which they are not now. As linked in another previous post, it appears that H2 may already have reached that point in the U.K, with their much higher gas prices (always assuming that these stations can indeed be operated at a profit for that price); they are at least in the ballpark. FCEVs don't have to be cheaper to operate than BEVs, they only have to be cheaper (or at least the same) as fossil-fueled cars. Those that can benefit from the price (given home charging)/efficiency advantages of BEVs and can charge them reliably and conveniently will opt for them, and everyone else can opt for FCEVs. Either that, or we're stuck with fossil-fuels for the mass of the world's urban car-owning population, barring sustainable bio-fuels being commercialized.