thankyouOB said:
I am not sure why you are so angry and so quick to put folks down.
I made no ad hominem attack on you, I was simply rebutting unsupportable assertions and speculations you were making, while pointing out that contradictory information was available in this very thread and others, if you did a little more reading before posting your theories. This is a general problem with forums like this. People tend to type before they read, don't bother searching for answers first before asking questions, and make claims about things without researching them. You are not alone in that respect.
I make a point of keeping all my posts civil and try to question the factual basis for ideas or opinions politely, without attacking the poster's character. I back that up by using my real name and taking responsibility for what I write. You obviously did not look at my history here if you think I'm a put-down artist. I challenge you to find a single post out of the nearly 300 I have made here that truly flames anyone for anything. If I am angry at anybody, it is at Nissan for what seems to be an opaque and inequitable order fulfillment/delivery scheme.
thankyouOB said:
what I know is that right after ETEC approval, I got OK to order.
You are not unique in that respect. This also happened with me and everyone else who is in the EVP, except perhaps for the late addition of the SF Bay area, where some people had ordered already before the region was added to the project. I was supposed to be a Sept. order, but Ecotality had trouble arranging my home assessment in time, and my order was delayed until Oct. 1, which was 3 days after they approved me. Until Nissan knows that you are accepted, they will not let an EVP applicant RAQ, as they need to know that you are eligible for the SL-etec model before opening your dashboard. This fact has also been discussed elsewhere on this forum.
I'm sorry if I offended you, but wrong is wrong, and I could not let your statements stand and confuse people further.
TT