Herm said:
At least there is one thing we agree on--lots of issues.
I remember when parking was mostly free in Southern California in the early sixties, and then the parking racketeers arrived from back East about 40 years ago. Many of the parking companies are traded stocks, and they also have revenue sharing deals with landlords. The have steadily been raising rates and reducing service (not manning sites but using credit card readers).
For example, the parking in Santa Monica was built by taxpayer funds, and there were no gate arms, so folks were encouraged to come shop in the area.
The business model for parking is based on charging what the market will bear in all cases, and controlling competition by elimination.
I have no problem with parking for free at LAX as most of the space in the complex remain at a low percentage of capacity as the parking operators seek a model that maximized revenue rather than usage.
I would never pay $40 day to park there, but by allowing ZEVs to park there, externalties, such as pollution and resource depletion are mitigated.
So, yes, by allowing ZEVs taking one trip to take a flight, and one trip home, has benefits compared to having a friend double that in mileage, and more so in using a finite resource.
That's my argument and evidence.