DougWantsALeaf
Well-known member
It seems that there is still only a trickle of Niros and Konas making it to the US.
WetEV said:Oils4AsphaultOnly said:You're considering a bolt and dropped the i-pace. I don't understand how the e-tron is even in the running? I'm seeing a preference for hatchbacks (ergo no model 3), but why no i-pace?
As for the Kona EV, there's a few in the Portland Hyundai dealership, which is 150 miles from Bellevue, so it's well within the range of the car.
That's a four hour drive to look at a car, I'm north of Seattle, and the Portland Hyundai web page says there are two that are "coming soon".
I'll take another look at the i-pace. I don't like glass roofs. And the charging port is on the right fender, behind the front wheel, will be awkward in my garage.
What's your dislike of the e-tron?
GerryAZ said:WetEV,
I share your concerns about new EVs. The Bolt is too small for my needs (seats are improved for 2019, but luggage space is too small). The Model 3 has the speedometer incorporated into the center screen (which I find distracting), but luggage space is adequate. I took a test drive in an SL+ and liked everything except the instrument panel (prefer the old display, but can tolerate the new) and the console (in the way of moving my leg). Kia and Hyundai are not available here. The Jag is nice, but I have an SUV with true off-road capability for long trips. I will check to see if the Audi is available here, but have my doubts. I was hoping Ford was serious when I heard about the F150, but it is at least 2 years away (if it happens). I am also concerned whether the cars with active thermal management will discharge themselves significantly while parked for extended time in my hot climate since I cannot plug in at my office or the airport when I travel.
I also have concerns about active thermal management, mixing water and lithium can be exciting, but GM seems to do ok.
GerryAZ said:The Bolt is too small for my needs (seats are improved for 2019, but luggage space is too small). The Model 3 has the speedometer incorporated into the center screen (which I find distracting), but luggage space is adequate.
GetOffYourGas said:GerryAZ said:The Bolt is too small for my needs (seats are improved for 2019, but luggage space is too small). The Model 3 has the speedometer incorporated into the center screen (which I find distracting), but luggage space is adequate.
This comment doesn't seem to match reality. Google for "Bolt EV Cargo Volume" and I get 16.9 cubit feet. The same search for model 3 says 15 cubic feet.
-LeftieBiker said:GetOffYourGas said:GerryAZ said:The Bolt is too small for my needs (seats are improved for 2019, but luggage space is too small). The Model 3 has the speedometer incorporated into the center screen (which I find distracting), but luggage space is adequate.
This comment doesn't seem to match reality. Google for "Bolt EV Cargo Volume" and I get 16.9 cubit feet. The same search for model 3 says 15 cubic feet.
The Bolt is tall but short. It can carry large cube-shaped objects but they can't be long. This translates to less usable-for-most cargo space. I assume the Model 3 has a longer, shallower cargo area.
-inphoenix said:Also, are we expecting the same kind of battery degradation in the 2019 plus models?
I don't think you will find a used Plus anytime soon.
DougWantsALeaf said:Anyone with a plus on this board faced rapidgate yet? I haven’t, but I am in Chicago not Mesa.
Besides having no use for an SUV nor wanting spending big $ for one (including a premium for an X for an S), I would never ever want to buy a Model X for reliability reasons nor would I ever recommend someone get one, unless they had time for a new "hobby".inphoenix said:a used 2017 Model X.
This is where CR fails, because they do not weight the problems. A squeak, or having to open and close the falcon door twice to get it to close is a lot different than being stranded.cwerdna said:Every single year that there's been enough data in Consumer Reports, Model X has either been in the bottom 10 vehicles in terms of reliability or dead last.
The Model X shouldn't be having the problems in the first place. It is an engineering disaster. LOL on your last point.SageBrush said:This is where CR fails, because they do not weight the problems. A squeak, or having to open and close the falcon door twice to get it to close is a lot different than being stranded.cwerdna said:Every single year that there's been enough data in Consumer Reports, Model X has either been in the bottom 10 vehicles in terms of reliability or dead last.
The Tesla Model X has high customer satisfaction, so you know that the problems are minor.
Enter your email address to join: