RegGuheert said:
Most automotive chargers simply charge at a temperature-compensated voltage around 14.5V since they have no idea how much current is going into the battery or is being used elsewhere. But clearly the LEAF is different in what it is doing. It may use more standard deep-cycle battery-charging algorithms, as you are indicating, since it possibly has access to the battery charging current, but if this is what Nissan has done, then that was an unwise decision. Why? Because it is critical to get lead-acid batteries back to a 100% SOC quickly without overcharging. Those normal algorithms work because there is charge continuously available (or often, as in PV applications). But in the LEAF, charging is available only occasionally, at best.
Just one comment on my previous comment: It's likely that the flooded deep-cycle battery in the LEAF cannot handle the high currents that would be associated with going straight to 14.5V on a mostly-discharged battery. As a result Nissan was probably forced to go with a non-standard algorithm. Still, what they are using does not seem to be working out.
Nubo said:
took my 11.67V battery out of the car to charge on a dedicated battery charger to see if it would perk it up. Did finally get to 100% SOC but by this morning had dropped back down to 11.9V so not a whole lot of lasting benefit. Definitely time for a replacement.
So you saw a resting voltage of 12.7V after you took it off the charger and let it sit for 30 minutes or so? If so, then I agree it is dead.
Nubo said:
Overkill always being appropriate, I am looking at this fellow:
http://www.trojanbatteryre.com/PDF/datasheets/22AGM_TrojanRE_Data_Sheets.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
50AH rating, deep cycle AGM. Definitely a far more capable battery that will tolerate periods of discharge.
I'm not sure I would call an AGM battery "overkill." "Differentkill" may be more like it. Here are some important differences to consider:
Benefits of AGM batteries:
- As you state, AGM batteries can handled sitting at lower SOCs better than flooded batteries.
- The electrolyte in a flooded battery will freeze at an increasingly higher temperature as the SOC drops. I believe the freezing point at 0% SOC is around 15F. This means that it's possible that the LEAF battery could suffer a "sudden death" up in the northern U.S. if it is not maintained close to full by the car. The freezing point of the electrolyte in an AGM battery stays very low, even at low SOCs.
- AGM batteries can handle much higher charge and discharge currents than flooded batteries. I'm not sure this is a benefit for the LEAF unless the charging algorithm could be changed to better suit the AGMs.
Benefits of flooded batteries:
- AGM batteries are sealed (with one-way valves to prevent overpressure). As a result, there is no way to replace water lost during overcharge. This makes AGMs *very* sensitive to overcharge. Flooded batteries, OTOH, can be topped of with distiller water, if needed. (BTW, did you check that in your current battery? The LEAF has a LOT of electrolyte above the plates when new, but since you are having issues, perhaps it is low.)
It is this last item that would worry me in the LEAF. As I noted the other day, our LEAF was charging the battery at 12.7V while climate control was running. That voltage would be fine for an AGM UNLESS it was fully charged. In that case, the battery would be rapidly releasing hydrogen and oxygen gasses, never to recover them. This would lead to very early battery death if it happened frequently enough. So, I guess the question comes down to whether or not the LEAF keeps track of the battery state of charge (or charge current draw) well enough to prevent frequent overcharging. It might, but it might not.
In the end, I would say it's worth a shot, given that the original battery did not last two years. Just be aware that it is possible that an AGM will die even faster!