DaveinOlyWA
Well-known member
lorenfb said:danrjones said:I think you would need a lot more samples, in controlled environments, to really be certain. Otherwise is speculative.
That sums it up!
Oh yeah, we can wait for that to happen.
lorenfb said:danrjones said:I think you would need a lot more samples, in controlled environments, to really be certain. Otherwise is speculative.
That sums it up!
LeftieBiker said:Could be, although when you look at the 30kwh pack, many of those are worse. Ironically, the best thing about the 30kwh "Lettuce Pack" is that it's being replaced when under warranty by the 40kwh... Cabbage Pack?
coleafrado said:LeftieBiker said:Could be, although when you look at the 30kwh pack, many of those are worse. Ironically, the best thing about the 30kwh "Lettuce Pack" is that it's being replaced when under warranty by the 40kwh... Cabbage Pack?
Do you actually get 40 kWh of usable range with the upgrade?
DougWantsALeaf said:Do you feel the range has also come down 10%?
nightleaf said:wow......I was not expecting a significant drop from last month.... but it looks like i am now in the below 90 group...
I might just start charging to 100 whenever I can as it does not seem t make much difference charging only to 80...
DougWantsALeaf said:Does anyone else find it Bizarre how consistent the data is between cars and location with the 40 (and increasingly so 62) batteries in terms of degradation? In the older batteries, we had Canadians with 90's into year 4 or even 5, and Phoenix residents with 11 bars after a year.
This round seems to be impervious of climate, and just marches down with time. Its almost like the BMS is trying to glide the battery into just miss the 70% in 8 year mark.
lorenfb said:DougWantsALeaf said:Does anyone else find it Bizarre how consistent the data is between cars and location with the 40 (and increasingly so 62) batteries in terms of degradation? In the older batteries, we had Canadians with 90's into year 4 or even 5, and Phoenix residents with 11 bars after a year.
This round seems to be impervious of climate, and just marches down with time. Its almost like the BMS is trying to glide the battery into just miss the 70% in 8 year mark.
Let's avoid guessing without more data, i.e. 2-3 years.
I was wondering the same thing. you get so much advice on here: Charge to 80%, only charge to 45%, don't fast charge, AC your garage, etc... who knows what really matters, if anything at all.
lorenfb said:DougWantsALeaf said:Does anyone else find it Bizarre how consistent the data is between cars and location with the 40 (and increasingly so 62) batteries in terms of degradation? In the older batteries, we had Canadians with 90's into year 4 or even 5, and Phoenix residents with 11 bars after a year.
This round seems to be impervious of climate, and just marches down with time. Its almost like the BMS is trying to glide the battery into just miss the 70% in 8 year mark.
Let's avoid guessing without more data, i.e. 2-3 years.
DaveinOlyWA said:lorenfb said:DougWantsALeaf said:Does anyone else find it Bizarre how consistent the data is between cars and location with the 40 (and increasingly so 62) batteries in terms of degradation? In the older batteries, we had Canadians with 90's into year 4 or even 5, and Phoenix residents with 11 bars after a year.
This round seems to be impervious of climate, and just marches down with time. Its almost like the BMS is trying to glide the battery into just miss the 70% in 8 year mark.
Let's avoid guessing without more data, i.e. 2-3 years.
Its been two years. How much time do you need? In previous packs, AZ cars left the rest in a few months. Southern tier states barely took a year and in many cases less.
Very little Leaf2 data, e.g. over 25K miles per vehicle, relative to Leaf1 data have been reported.
Enter your email address to join: