nosuchthing
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2010
- Messages
- 740
Two cases = statistically insignificant. Get me 10,000 cases. Then we have something to latch onto. I don't smoke pot, and of course smoking anything isn't good for the lungs. Obviously.
I mentioned pot only to illustrate the connection between smoking cigarettes and lung cancer not being caused by carcinogens, necessarily, but by radioactivity. And it could be easily eliminated if someone had the chutzpah to step on RJ's toes and tell them to stop fertilize tobacco plant with Apatite.
Lung cancer rates increased significantly during most of the 1900's(6). It's no coincidence that between 1938 and 1960, the level of polonium 210 in American tobacco tripled commensurate with the increased use of chemical fertilizers...
Read all about it here...
http://www.webspawner.com/users/radioactivethreat/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Surfing Slovak. Thanks for the correction, I majored in English in HS. Anyway, my take on this whole battery thing is that no one really knows, including Nissan, what the long term prognosis is, and what will come out of this experiment, really, 5 years down the pike, pun intended. We are the guinea pigs here, got a nice cashback on the deal, and loving the care-free, non-polluting car. Full charge is a necessity for us so whether my bet will pay off is secondary to our need to have the range. My philosophy is that I will be swapping those cells one way or another in 5 years for a much denser pack, with twice the range so it matters not what happens to the pack as long as it performs near its max capacity until that time. And since we're at 30,000 miles already and have nothing to report in terms of range loss, I think I earned my right to share my not-so-humble opinions with the world out there.
I'll be the first to admit if the pack shows range loss. And...it would be nice to hear from everyone participating what their situation is in terms of charging vs. range so we can get some hard data on this.
I mentioned pot only to illustrate the connection between smoking cigarettes and lung cancer not being caused by carcinogens, necessarily, but by radioactivity. And it could be easily eliminated if someone had the chutzpah to step on RJ's toes and tell them to stop fertilize tobacco plant with Apatite.
Lung cancer rates increased significantly during most of the 1900's(6). It's no coincidence that between 1938 and 1960, the level of polonium 210 in American tobacco tripled commensurate with the increased use of chemical fertilizers...
Read all about it here...
http://www.webspawner.com/users/radioactivethreat/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Surfing Slovak. Thanks for the correction, I majored in English in HS. Anyway, my take on this whole battery thing is that no one really knows, including Nissan, what the long term prognosis is, and what will come out of this experiment, really, 5 years down the pike, pun intended. We are the guinea pigs here, got a nice cashback on the deal, and loving the care-free, non-polluting car. Full charge is a necessity for us so whether my bet will pay off is secondary to our need to have the range. My philosophy is that I will be swapping those cells one way or another in 5 years for a much denser pack, with twice the range so it matters not what happens to the pack as long as it performs near its max capacity until that time. And since we're at 30,000 miles already and have nothing to report in terms of range loss, I think I earned my right to share my not-so-humble opinions with the world out there.
I'll be the first to admit if the pack shows range loss. And...it would be nice to hear from everyone participating what their situation is in terms of charging vs. range so we can get some hard data on this.