eHelmholtz
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 28, 2011
- Messages
- 355
wow!, you continually impress me with improvements on the OpenEVSE project!chris1howell said:
wow!, you continually impress me with improvements on the OpenEVSE project!chris1howell said:
GlennD said:The display adds no functionality to the EVSE but its really cool looking.
GlennD said:While bumbling through the code to me it looks like the watchdog timer is commented out. Am I missing something?
Yes... but why not just put the effort into getting lots of low cost Charging Stations installed?coolfilmaker said:Could this be implemented?
KevinSharpe said:Yes... but why not just put the effort into getting lots of low cost Charging Stations installed?coolfilmaker said:Could this be implemented?
coolfilmaker said:Could this be implemented?
garygid said:An 80 amp L2 still services roughly the same number of cars as
a 30 amp EVSE, primarily limited by how long people want to PARK
in the spot.
The second (significant) limitation is how much power the
vehicle can "eat" (16 amps for 2011-12 LEAFs).
QC would actually be much more useful, IMO.
asharpleaf said:Does this mean that at the 7-11 in San Bernardino the QC and the L2 could be plugged into the leaf at the same time and charge together?
except you then have a single point of failure and issues around waiting for a parking spot to become free. You also have to realise that very few cars will support 80A AC.coolfilmaker said:The idea is that it would be for more expensive 80 amp stations that can service more people per day.
asharpleaf said:Does this mean that at the 7-11 in San Bernardino the QC and the L2 could be plugged into the leaf at the same time and charge together?
GlennD said:Lincomatic, I am not willing to test the watchdog timer on my 2 surface mount boards. It seemed to me that the best test setup would be an aurdino shield setup since if it locked up the processor another $5 chip could plugged in.
Thanks for explaining the reason the watchdog was disabled.
garygid said:An 80 amp L2 still services roughly the same number of cars as
a 30 amp EVSE, primarily limited by how long people want to PARK
in the spot.
The second (significant) limitation is how much power the
vehicle can "eat" (16 amps for 2011-12 LEAFs).
QC would actually be much more useful, IMO.
KevinSharpe said:except you then have a single point of failure and issues around waiting for a parking spot to become free. You also have to realise that very few cars will support 80A AC.coolfilmaker said:The idea is that it would be for more expensive 80 amp stations that can service more people per day.
lincomatic said:garygid said:An 80 amp L2 still services roughly the same number of cars as
a 30 amp EVSE, primarily limited by how long people want to PARK
in the spot.
The second (significant) limitation is how much power the
vehicle can "eat" (16 amps for 2011-12 LEAFs).
QC would actually be much more useful, IMO.
Chris and I were discussing a current sharing system a while back for locations with limited power available.
The idea was to link a bunch of the EVSE's together. Say you have 80A available for all the EVSE's.
One could set up a 4-headed EVSE. When one car is plugged in, it can charge up to 80A. When 4 cars are present,
they eatch get 20A. As each car fully charges and its load is removed, the extra available current can be sent to the other cars.
This way, cars that finish charging won't be hogging the entire EVSE.
It would be great if cars actually pay attention to the pilot's PWM duty cycle during charging and to adjust their current draw on the fly, but I have a feeling that this isn't very common. On the other hand, if a car which can't "eat" much current arrives at the EVSE first, it will only take 16A, and the rest can be allocated to the other ports. Not as efficient sharing, but still better than one car at a time.
Enter your email address to join: