blackvalkyrie said:
Two eco-sloths "race" each other - priceless !
I won't believe the "sloth" moniker until I get my LEAF and find out several things for myself.
One: whether it's true that the LEAF can do a burn-out with the traction control turned off: http://blog.caranddriver.com/10best-surprise-the-nissan-leaf-burns-a-different-petroleum-product/
Two: the LEAF's 60-foot and 330-foot times, from a standing start.
Based on my very limited test drive experience which included flooring the accelerator from a crawl for about 100 feet, I suspect the LEAF can be a more-than-willing accomplice for limited degrees of hooliganism.
GeorgeParrott said:
My recollection on comparative acceleration tests is that the Volt is about .5 second FASTER to 60 mph and about 1 second faster in the quarter mile with maybe 10-15 mph faster top end.
Pardon me while I rectify a pet peeve: "fast" describes velocity; "quick" describes acceleration. A car is "fast" if its top speed is 250 mph, but if it takes all day to reach that speed, is not "quick". An example of a "fast" car is a land speed record vehicle with very tall gearing. Conversely, a vehicle can be very quick, getting up to speed very quickly, but if it is not able to reach a very high speed, is not "fast". An example might be a dragster.
Boomer23 said:
Here are some numbers from Road and Track that I posted a while back:
............LEAF Volt
0-10mph:..0.7 sec 0.8 sec
0-20:.....1.8 ..1.9
0-30:.....3.0 ..3.1
0-40:.....4.6 ..4.6
0-50:.....6.7.. 6.4
0-60:.....9.4 ..8.8
0-70:.....13.1 ..11.7
[...]
You'll note that LEAF is ahead by a bit until 40 mph, but Volt is well ahead by 60 mph.
And again pardon me while I rectify my
other pet peeve
. Time-to-speed and time-to-distance are different and not necessarily related things. This is why one car may have a lower 0-60 time (or 0-30 time, or 0-40 time) but takes longer to cover the quarter mile.
Consider these five cars:
- 2009 Ferrari F430 Scuderia
- 2007 BMW Alpina B7
- 2007 Lexus IS350
- 2011 Leaf
- 2011 Volt
whose acceleration times are charted in
a graph,
here. In that graph, the area under a curve represents the distance traveled. The Leaf may be quicker to 30mph than the Volt but takes longer to cover the quarter-mile. Here's
another graph illustrating the (exaggerated) difference between a "quick" car and a "fast" car.
Pretty funny, though, how we're debating performance specs for the current contenders for top eco-machine. :lol:
"Performance" and "eco-machine" are not necessarily mutually exclusive terms. I may be a gourmet chef, that that does not necessarily mean that I don't enjoy a Five Guys burger now and then.
This also reminds me of what Peter Egan wrote in Road & Track a long time ago. Someone asked him what kind of speeds he gets up to on the track in his race car (a Triumph TR6 or something like that). When he said "Oh, maybe about 80 mph..." people look like him like "That's it?!" Egan's point was that in some cars, 80 mph
feels like taking your life into your own hands.