tps
Well-known member
The demand charge does not pay for energy generated or consumed. The point of the demand charge is to pay for the larger "pipe" (and maintenance costs) through which the energy flows, not for the energy itself. Grid-tied solar will not change the size of the pipe required for nighttime charging.hill said:What CAN'T be explained, is WHY in the world the utility Will NOT credit back (at the same rate that the utility charges end users) a QC facility that uses a solar array - which can easily push back onto the grid (YES ... during peak usage, when no one's charging) as much power as is being used by EV's - provided the PV array is large enough. Please answer why THAT is, Mr wizard.
Now, in practice, I think the demand charge is inflated into a "sin tax" to encourage consumers to lower their peak demand. Remember, in the big picture high peak demand not only means more and larger transmission and distribution facilities, it means more power plants to generate the power. That said, grid-tie solar should be encouraged, because while there has to be a large enough pipe to absorb the power generated by a ditributed grid-tied solar array, likely this power doesn't have to be transmitted very far before it is consumed. The biggest flaw to this is that the distribution system has to be sized as if the distributed solar generation didn't exist; one doesn't want the grid to collapse from overload on a cloudy day...