aindian1 said:Having reviewed the two threads, I have to say it is super confusing. Since I am in Bay Area with no snow and not much heavy rains, I think it may be be ok to stick with Ecopia? Any thoughts?
I would like the lowest rolling resistance tires I can get. If there are any comprehensive lists that rank LRR tires I'm not aware of them. And anecdotal reports don't help much.aindian1 said:Having reviewed the two threads, I have to say it is super confusing. Since I am in Bay Area with no snow and not much heavy rains, I think it may be be ok to stick with Ecopia? Any thoughts?
The MXV4 has been superseded by the Premier A/S. So far anecdotal reports indicate that it has better rolling resistance than the MXV4.myleaf said:someone in another tread mentioned that there is a new version of the
Michelin primacy mxv4 89H.
Had Michelin Energy Saver A/S on Honda Fit EV for 48k and Ford C-Max Energi for 40k. Replaced both with Michelin Premier A/S. Better traction, but suffered a 7% range loss on both vehicles. Have Energy Saver A/S on Chevy Bolt which could use more traction, but I don't want to give up the range, so will replace with same. Drivers with real winter mostly went to snow tires for winter driving, though a few thought the Energy Saver was acceptable in wet/snow. My wife was not happy with wet traction, which is why we went with the Premiers on the C-Max.drees said:The MXV4 has been superseded by the Premier A/S. So far anecdotal reports indicate that it has better rolling resistance than the MXV4.myleaf said:someone in another tread mentioned that there is a new version of the
Michelin primacy mxv4 89H.
As far as Michelins go, the only tire that might be better from a rolling resistance perspective would be the Energy Saver, but keep in mind it's a Summer tire. It's also hard to find and expensive.
Enter your email address to join: