="JohnOver"
...I drive down the hill (from 1600') to basically sea level in Palo Alto each morning and then back up the hill in the evening. I charge to 80% at home and 100% at work.
I noticed that the discrepancy (in mi/kWh) between the dash and Battery App was 14% going down hill to work, and -3% going up hill to home. I can't think of any reason for this other than the Battery App is not fully capturing the regenerated energy during the 10 mile downhill...
You might want to look at the
Discuss data obtained from the LEAF Battery app thread.
http://www.mynissanleaf.com/viewtopic.php?f=44&t=12789" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Where my LEAF app actually showed a significant increase in the Wh capacity while I was making a series of short, level trips.
The self-charging BEV!
The maximum discrepancy (in mi/kWh) between MY leafs kWh use reported and the Battery App was when, from an "80%" initial charge, after 17.9 miles driven with an ~1500 ft net elevation loss, the nav screen showed 17.9 m/kWh and CarWings
1.0 net kWh use (Dash limited to 8.0 m/kWh, of course) while the App reported
2.872 kWh used.
As near as I can tell, the App-reported error rate is not directly attributable to either regen or temperature, or even both combined.
The Wh use reports from the App seem to consistently overstate energy from "80%" and"100%" when I start my trips with a net descent, but also from the kWh use from "100%" when I start with a net ascent. Of course, the battery temp is increasing on all these drive as well.
The App reports also considerably
understates Wh use at lower SOC levels, so the app numbers "catch up" with my LEAFs internal Wh use reports over the discharge, but it still consistently overstates use relative to the total charge by ~500-800 WH by the time the VLBW is reached.
Never gone below the ~VLBW SOC, but it looks like the Wh use numbers
might ~converge after a full discharge of the available capacity.
Anyone checked that out?
="Turbo3"
So the correct question is why does the Leaf give you those results when using the numbers from the CAN-BUS. Perhaps the numbers from the Leaf do not exactly match what we think they mean. We are reverse engineering the meaning.
The mystery to me, is how the dash/nav screen/CarWings kWh use data is so (apparently) consistent, if it is being generated by the same data your app is picking up?
Thanks again for the work, Turbo3.
Even though the results gave me my first real case of range anxiety in over a year.
It was during my first trip back top the bay area since we met at the April BAYLEAFS meeting.
I recharged in Orland to "100%", after ~50 miles into the ~86 miles trip, and with another ~1200 ft of net ascent ahead of me, the overstatement of kWh use from the App convinced me I just might see the turtle (for the first time) ~10 miles (and the wrong other side of a pass) short of my destination in Clear Lake.
I wound up reaching my destination with nearly a kWh left before the VLBW.
No harm done, except to the LEAF's image in the minds of all the ICEV drivers who witnessed my pathetic ~38 mph average speed climb up out of the Central Valley on highway 20...