Unprecedented 2012 Summer arctic ice melt

My Nissan Leaf Forum

Help Support My Nissan Leaf Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

edatoakrun

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2010
Messages
5,222
Location
Shasta County, North California
I thought there might be interest in a thread on the Summer arctic ice melt, now that it looks like most every record of minimum ice, in both extent of coverage and volume, on sea and land, look likely to be broken in the next month.

21 August 2012 Last updated at 06:55 ET
Environment reporter, BBC News

Arctic sea ice looks set to hit a record low by the end of the month, according to satellite data.

Scientists at the US National Snow and Ice Data Center said data showed that the sea ice extent was tracking below the previous record low, set in 2007.

Latest figures show that on 13 August ice extent was 483,000 sq km (186,000 sq miles) below the previous record low for the same date five years ago.

The ice is expected to continue melting until mid- to late September.

"A new daily record... would be likely by the end of August," the centre's lead scientist, Ted Scambos, told Reuters...

this year's projected record minimum could result in a change in projections of when the Arctic would be sea ice-free during summer months.

"The previous [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] report (published in 2007) stated that the likely date for an ice-free Arctic in the summer - and definitions for this vary a bit - was 2100," he explained.

"When we had the 2007 minimum, that date was brought forward to 2030-2040.

"The fact that we look set to get another record ice minimum in such a short space of time means that the modellers may once again need to go and look at what their projections are telling them."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-19330307#" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Daily images of the Icecap melt and the graph of sea ice decline by date in the BBC story, are from the NSIDC:

http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The Arctic Sea Ice blog has interesting coverage, such as:

The untold drama of Northern snow cover

When considering the impact of climate change on polar regions, the star of the show has always been Arctic sea ice. Playing supporting roles are the Greenland ice cap and Antarctica. Yet one actor in the drama remains badly overlooked: the snows that cover our Northern continents.

In June 2012, for instance, it was reported that Northern Hemisphere Land Snow Cover had broken a record. The June snow anomaly was the lowest figure for June in the whole 45 year record, besting the previous record set in 2010 by 1 million square kilometres...

http://neven1.typepad.com/blog/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

RealClimate also has a thread devoted to the subject, with many interesting links:

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2012/08/arctic-sea-ice-minimum-2012/comment-page-3/#comments" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
 
edatoakrun said:
I thought there might be interest in a thread on the Summer arctic ice melt, now that it looks like most every record of minimum ice, in both extent of coverage and volume, on sea and land, look likely to be broken in the next month.

Or has already been broken.
 
Perhaps the Republican folks are still claiming that these reports are
fake, or just natural hot/ice age cycles, and that more power plants
should be given exemptions to any requirements to clean up their exhaust?
 
garygid said:
Perhaps the Republican folks are still claiming that these reports are
fake, or just natural hot/ice age cycles, and that more power plants
should be given exemptions to any requirements to clean up their exhaust?

I suspect they'd call it something akin to a legitimate rape.
 
garygid said:
Perhaps the Republican folks are still claiming that these reports are
fake, or just natural hot/ice age cycles, and that more power plants
should be given exemptions to any requirements to clean up their exhaust?

Not that I'd wish a hurricane on anyone, even republicans, but it could be seen as poetic justice* if...

For three straight simulations, NOAA’s Global Forecast System (GFS) model has tracked a tropical system right over the Florida peninsula through or close to Tampa just as the Republican National Convention is ramping up. Assuming this system - presently a little swirl in the open Atlantic - strengthens some, it will be named Isaac.

Before anyone gets alarmed or excited, consider forecasts of the path and intensity of tropical systems this far out have essentially no skill. As our tropical weather specialist Brian McNoldy said earlier: “In the 5-7 day period and beyond, weather details become fairly unpredictable.”

If this model defeats the long odds against it and is somehow right, organizers say they’re ready for the possibility of a hurricane Isaac during the convention...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/post/could-potential-storm-isaac-wreak-havoc-at-republican-convention/2012/08/20/49924d8e-eae8-11e1-a80b-9f898562d010_blog.html?tid=pm_pop" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;\

And with today's update, it's still a long shot, but the odds seem to be shortening.

Tropical Depression Nine will certainly become Tropical Storm Isaac. That is only a matter of time as this system appears to be getting organized and has broken away from the dust infused dry Saharan Air Layer from Africa. The has been some wind shear from the northeast limiting its growth, but that is expected to diminish by Wednesday and allow this to feed off of warm water to grow in a hurry.

The concern is that the latest computer models largely agree that this should reach Category 2 intensity with 100 mph winds or higher. The path now takes the storm wither directly over Florida or to the east...
http://www.examiner.com/article/isaac-soon-to-be-named-tropical-storms-expected-hurricane-threat-to-us" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

*...At some point in Isaac's youth, his father Abraham brought him to mount Moriah. At God's command, Abraham was to build a sacrificial altar and sacrifice his son Isaac upon it. After he had bound his son to the altar and drawn his knife to kill him, at the very last moment an angel of God prevented Abraham from proceeding...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

And perhaps another divine intervention will prevent the republicans from pursuing their current plans of human sacrifice...
 
I have been following the arctic ice melt since 2007. The site I watch at this time of year, near the minumum, is updated daily:

http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/arctic.sea.ice.interactive.html

ArcticIceMelt2012-M.jpg


You can see that 2011, in red, almost broke the 2007 record, and 2012, in yellow, apparently has just crossed beyond the record minimum with several weeks more melt to go.

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2012/08/extreme-metrics/
has an interesting new report on how revisit times for extreme weather events (such as arctic ice melt) is a powerful metric for tracking global climate change.
 
tbleakne said:
You can see that 2011, in red, almost broke the 2007 record, and 2012, in yellow, apparently has just crossed beyond the record minimum with several weeks more melt to go.
I am not clear why NSIDC shows the extent as still slightly above 2007:

http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Are they using different data sets, or calculating something slightly differently?
 
Stoaty said:
tbleakne said:
You can see that 2011, in red, almost broke the 2007 record, and 2012, in yellow, apparently has just crossed beyond the record minimum with several weeks more melt to go.
I am not clear why NSIDC shows the extent as still slightly above 2007:

http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Are they using different data sets, or calculating something slightly differently?

ASIB has some answers to your question in today's post.

...There are several scientific organisations that keep an eye on the Arctic sea ice cover and put out graphs to inform us of the amount of ice that is left. You can see most, if not all, of them on the ASI Graphs webpage. I expect the record on most of these graphs to be broken in weeks to come.

If I were addicted to records, I'd have OD-ed by now. Out of the approximately 9 sea ice extent and area graphs on the ASI Graphs page, 4 have broken their record so far. After Uni Bremen extent, Arctic ROOS area, Cryosphere Today sea ice area (big one), we have a new sea ice domino: Danish Meteorological Institute sea ice extent. DMI uses a 30% threshold instead of the more habitual 15% (meaning every grid cell containing a concentration higher than 30% gets counted for total extent)...

http://neven1.typepad.com/blog/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
 
Arctic sea Ice volume is also being tracked, albeit probably with less precision than the area of coverage.

Most, like PIOMAS, are finding even greater reduction of sea ice by volume.

Looks like we already lost close to two-thirds of the arctic September sea ice by 2011.


Arctic Sea Ice Volume Anomaly

Sea Ice Volume is calculated using the Pan-Arctic Ice Ocean Modeling and Assimilation System (PIOMAS, Zhang and Rothrock, 2003) developed at APL/PSC. Anomalies for each day are calculated relative to the average over the 1979 -2010 period for that day of the year to remove the annual cycle. The model mean annual cycle of sea ice volume over this period ranges from 28,700 km3 in April to 12,300 km3 in September. The blue line represents the trend calculated from January 1 1979 to the most recent date indicated on the figure. Monthly averaged ice volume for September 2011 was 4,200 km3. This value is 66% lower than the mean over this period, 75% lower than the maximum in 1979, and 2.0 standard deviations below the 1979-2011 trend. Ice volume for July 2012 was 8300 km3 , about 700 km3 less than last year but 65% lower than the maximum in 1979, 55% below the mean and 2.2 standard deviations from the trend. Shaded areas represent one and two standard deviations of the residuals of the anomaly from the trend. Updates will be generated at approximately one-month intervals. Although PIOMAS ice volume for September 2011 was 380 km3 lower than the previous record of 2010, this difference is within the estimated uncertainty of PIOMAS...

http://psc.apl.washington.edu/wordpress/research/projects/arctic-sea-ice-volume-anomaly/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
 
Current projection has Isaac over Tampa Monday afternoon. Convention starts Monday.

However, if Isaac doesn't track somewhat to the south, crossing southern Haiti and then Cuba will likely weaken or kill it.
 
WetEV said:
Current projection has Isaac over Tampa Monday afternoon. Convention starts Monday.

However, if Isaac doesn't track somewhat to the south, crossing southern Haiti and then Cuba will likely weaken or kill it.

Totally off topic, but I couldn't resist the other posts on the republican "thought process" yesterday.

And it's been picked up in the WAPO today:


...Coincidence? Or part of some Intelligent Design?

By their own logic, Republicans and their conservative allies should be concerned that Isaac is a form of divine retribution. Last year, Rep. Michele Bachmann, then a Republican presidential candidate, said that the East Coast earthquake and Hurricane Irene — another “I” storm, but not an Old Testament one — were attempts by God “to get the attention of the politicians.” In remarks later termed a “joke,” she said: “It’s time for an act of God and we’re getting it.”

The influential conservative broadcaster Glenn Beck said last year that the Japanese earthquake and tsunami were God’s “message being sent” to that country. A year earlier, Christian broadcaster and former GOP presidential candidate Pat Robertson tied the Haitian earthquake to that country’s “pact to the devil.”

Previously, Robertson had argued that Hurricane Katrina was God’s punishment for abortion, while the Rev. John Hagee said the storm was God’s way of punishing homosexuality. The late Jerry Falwell thought that God allowed the Sept. 11 attacks as retribution for feminists and the ACLU.

Even if you don’t believe God uses meteorological phenomena to express His will, it’s difficult for mere mortals to explain what is happening to the GOP just now...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/dana-milbank-are-republicans-getting-a-sign-from-above/2012/08/21/3424ba0a-ebd2-11e1-9ddc-340d5efb1e9c_story.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
 
Stoaty said:
tbleakne said:
You can see that 2011, in red, almost broke the 2007 record, and 2012, in yellow, apparently has just crossed beyond the record minimum with several weeks more melt to go.
I am not clear why NSIDC shows the extent as still slightly above 2007:

http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Are they using different data sets, or calculating something slightly differently?
I am no expert, but my understanding is that the calculation of sea ice area has a partially subjective component as to what pixels you count as ice covered and what you don't.

There is no dispute that the concurrent decline in ice thickness means that the total ice volume has declined more precipitously. In the video link above, Jennifer Francis shows a video of how most of the thicker, multi-year ice has gradually been flushed out of the arctic basin over the last decade or so. The thinner 1 or 2-year ice that is left is much more easily melted and pushed around by the wind, leaving the ice pack more vulnerable to further decline.

After the 2007 extra melt-down, there was speculation that this might signal a tipping point that would soon lead to nearly ice-free arctic summers, but this didn't happen, with some ice recovery in 2008-2010. With 2012 following a strong melt in 2011 without much unusual arctic weather as there was in 2007, who knows ?

How ice thickness is measured is interesting. Jennifer presents data from submarines probing the depth of the underside of the ice sheet. Satellites can now measure the range to the top of the ice sheet with a accuracy of a fraction of a foot. This, together with very precise GPS data for their position, and the buoyancy of ice, allows the ice thickness to be determined.
 
tbleakne said:
Stoaty said:
Are they using different data sets, or calculating something slightly differently?
I am no expert, but my understanding is that the calculation of sea ice area has a partially subjective component as to what pixels you count as ice covered and what you don't.

I am no expert as well, but there is both sea ice area (any ice covered pixel is counted) and sea ice extent (with more than some fraction counted). Sea ice extent also isn't the same fraction on different records, with 10%, 15% and 20% all being used. Why these values? I don't know. And then there is sea ice volume, which depends on getting an measurement or estimate of ice thickness at each pixel as well.

Data sources are different and methods of converting the raw data into a sea ice area or extent estimate are different.

All of the methods are giving a very similar answer: the ice is melting.
 
Arctic sea ice is at a minimum on one of the most followed record sets.

http://www.ijis.iarc.uaf.edu/en/home/seaice_extent.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Some discussion on Neven's blog.

http://neven1.typepad.com/blog/2012/08/record-dominoes-6-ijis-sea-ice-extent.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The only other widely followed data set is the NSIDC daily (and monthly averaged) sea ice extent.

Edit: Duh, also the ice volume data sets, PIOMAS and the brand new CRYOSTAT2 satellite.

http://psc.apl.washington.edu/wordpress/research/projects/arctic-sea-ice-volume-anomaly/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
 
The Guardian, summarizing both the reality, and the various reports and methodologies:

Arctic sea ice levels to reach record low within days

The dramatic melt expected over the next week signals that global warming is having a major impact on the polar region

Arctic sea ice is set to reach its lowest ever recorded extent as early as this weekend, in "dramatic changes" signalling that man-made global warming is having a major impact on the polar region.

With the melt happening at an unprecedented rate of more than 100,000 sq km a day, and at least a week of further melt expected before ice begins to reform ahead of the northern winter, satellites are expected to confirm the record – currently set in 2007 – within days.

"Unless something really unusual happens we will see the record broken in the next few days. It might happen this weekend, almost certainly next week," Julienne Stroeve, a scientist at the US National Snow and Ice Data Centre (NSIDC) in Boulder, Colorado, told the Guardian.

"In the last few days it has been losing 100,000 sq km a day, a record in itself for August. A storm has spread the ice pack out, opening up water, bringing up warmer water. Things are definitely changing quickly."

Because ice thickness, volume, extent and area are all measured differently, it may be a week before there is unanimous agreement among the world's cryologists (ice experts) that 2012 is a record year. Four out of the nine daily sea ice extent and area graphs kept by scientists in the US, Europe and Asia suggest that records have already been broken. "The whole energy balance of the Arctic is changing. There's more heat up there. There's been a change of climate and we are losing more seasonal ice. The rate of ice loss is faster than the models can capture [but] we can expect the Arctic to be ice-free in summer by 2050," said Stroeve.

"Only 15 years ago I didn't expect to see such dramatic changes – no one did. The ice-free season is far longer now. Twenty years ago it was about a month. Now it's three months. Temperatures last week in the Arctic were 14C, which is pretty warm."

Scientists at the Danish Meteorological Institute, the Arctic Regional Ocean Observing System in Norway and others in Japan have said the ice is very close to its minimum recorded in 2007. The University of Bremen, whose data does not take into account ice along a 30km coastal zone, says it sees ice extent below the all-time record low of 4.33m sq km recorded in September 2007.

Ice volume in the Arctic has declined dramatically over the past decade. The 2011 minimum was more than 50% below that of 2005. According to the Polar Science Centre at the University of Washington it now stands at around 5,770 cubic kilometres, compared with 12,433 cu km during the 2000s and 6,494 cu km in 2011. The ice volume for 31 July 2012 was roughly 10% below the value for the same day in 2011. A new study by UK scientists suggests that 900 cu km of summer sea ice has disappeared from the Arctic ocean over the past year.

The consequences of losing the Arctic's ice coverage for the summer months are expected to be immense. If the white sea ice no longer reflects sunlight back into space, the region can be expected to heat up even more than at present. This could lead to an increase in ocean temperatures with unknown effects on weather systems in northern latitudes...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/aug/23/arctic-sea-ice-record-low" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
 
The NSIDC FTP site has extent lower today than any day in in 2007. The graph got confused, and was then reverted to yesterdays graph. See:

http://neven1.typepad.com/blog/2012/08/record-dominoes-8-nsidc-daily-sea-ice-extent.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

After the NSIDC, about all that is left is the monthly records, such as PIOMAS (volume).

Still likely to be two or three more weeks of melting this year.
 
Back
Top