TRONZ
Well-known member
jamesanne said:The complaining in this forum is really getting old.
I would definitely suggest it is not helping make the roll-out process quicker or smoother.
jamesanne said:The complaining in this forum is really getting old.
jamesanne said:I am fine waiting. My dash board last said order date fall 2011. From day one Nissan clearly stated their plan for distribution to specific regions and states. I understand the argument here, but at the end of the day, Nissan said fall 2011 and it's not fall 2011 yet.
The complaining in this forum is really getting old.
TRONZ said:jamesanne said:The complaining in this forum is really getting old.
I would definitely suggest it is not helping make the roll-out process quicker or smoother.
relytgerg said:Here's my draft letter to go to Ghosn, with copies to Tavares and US Customer Service.
Feedback would be appreciated.
April 20, 2011
It was one year ago today that I placed my reservation far a Nissan Leaf. It’s ironic that exactly one year later, an announcement from Nissan informs me that, not only will I be waiting another year, but others will be able to reserve their Leafs more than a year after me and receive them long before I do. This is totally unacceptable. In fact, it’s unconscionable. Nissan is doing a disservice to potential customers like me who have waited patiently, only to be slapped in the face with this news.
Nissan is alienating the customer base that is not fortunate enough to live in one of the first United States markets. This will result in much negative publicity for Nissan as well as a loss of business. Personally, I’ll be buying from a competitor whose product will likely hit the market before I can even order my Leaf. Even if their product is delayed and more expensive, I won’t be getting a Leaf unless Nissan changes its approach because I wish to deal with a company that treats its customers fairly.
It is unfortunate that Nissan has chosen to turn potential customers like me, who were evangelists for the Leaf, into dissatisfied potential customers who will communicate that dissatisfaction about Nissan as a company for years to come at two to three times the rate that satisfied customers will communicate.
I sincerely hope that Nissan will see the error of its ways and decide to more equitably take orders on a first registered, first served basis.
Please do not tell me that I need to wait for my municipality to establish a charging infrastructure. I don’t need it. Please don’t tell me I need to wait for local dealers to be trained and ready. That’s your problem, not mine. And, please don’t send me a form letter in reply. That will only serve to make me even more dissatisfied.
I look forward to your response.
Sincerely,
So you want the dealer to deliver your car not knowing anything about it and if you have a problem during the warranty period to say they don't know how to fix it. Not to egg this on, but could you please draft a letter if you where in either of those situations and post it here. I would absolutely love to read it. You are asking them to create a situation that would be a complete failure. It is their "responsibility" not "problem" to make sure that the cars are properly delivered and supported.relytgerg said:Please don’t tell me I need to wait for local dealers to be trained and ready. That’s your problem, not mine.
relytgerg said:TRONZ said:jamesanne said:The complaining in this forum is really getting old.
I would definitely suggest it is not helping make the roll-out process quicker or smoother.
I agree. Let's start complaining to Nissan.
I suspect all the initial 20,000 registration holders who order will get either MY 2011 or MY 2012 LEAFs, so they'll all be from Oppama. Smyrna will not be online by then, and Oppama simply doesn't have the bandwidth to crank out 200,000 LEAFs that fast, ignoring the fact that they are also selling to countries other than the US. I think those of us reservation holders in the forgotten 36 will be fine, so far as the federal tax rebate goes.jimcmorr said:Any idea how this revelation effects our eligibility for the federal tax credit? I thought that was limited to the first 200,000 vehicles manufactured.
Customers in your state still can't order. What are your damages for your lawsuit?N952JL said:My first date for order was spring of 2011. On 12/10/2010 @ 8:55 PM Nissan Leaf sent me a message subject "Nissan LEAF: Order timing update". Which stated "Customers in your state will not be able to order until late summer 2011."
N952JL said:Breach of contract. Damage could be major if I went out to buy an LEAF on the open market and had to pay more than MSRP. But the big one is getting them on fraud. Entering into a contract that they had no intention of keeping. They should have never let people from outside their target areas reserve a place in line, if they were not going to honor it. And by letting new people leap frog ahead of those already in line, they are proving they did not intend to honor the original reservation.
If you buy the Leaf on the open market, any extra amount you pay is of your own free will. There is no contract with Nissan about when they will allow you to order. Please take this nonsense somewhere else. If you file a lawsuit--and win--come back and report on it then.N952JL said:Breach of contract. Damage could be major if I went out to buy an LEAF on the open market and had to pay more than MSRP. But the big one is getting them on fraud. Entering into a contract that they had no intention of keeping. They should have never let people from outside their target areas reserve a place in line, if they were not going to honor it.
Get a lawyer, maybe he or she can explain to you what damages and fraud are. I'll watch for your case in the news. I'm still fine waiting, so don't ask me to join the case. I don't feel the need to "get" Nissan.N952JL said:Breach of contract. Damage could be major if I went out to buy an LEAF on the open market and had to pay more than MSRP. But the big one is getting them on fraud. Entering into a contract that they had no intention of keeping. They should have never let people from outside their target areas reserve a place in line, if they were not going to honor it. And by letting new people leap frog ahead of those already in line, they are proving they did not intend to honor the original reservation.
Enter your email address to join: