AndyH
Well-known member
I understand, thanks. My question is "why not?!" It's clear from both studies and real-world installations that H2 generation/storage is less expensive than sodium sulfur batteries - yet they're buying more batteries.JeremyW said:That because California has no plans to use hydrogen as grid storage. Hydro, gas turbines, demand response, batteries, and CAISO's new Energy Imbalance Market are being used to make up for intermittent renewables.AndyH said:There was an NPR story on the 11th about storage on the California power grid. It was disappointing to hear that NPR seemed to be parroting industry talking points. And of course, nothing about hydrogen.
If the citizens of Germany, San Antonio and Denton, TX, and other areas can drive their region's energy choices, why can't Californians?
http://cleantechnica.com/2013/12/02/city-owned-texas-utility-already-serves-40-renewable-energy/