As I mentioned before, if
this were occurring, where there is NO winter (equatorial!) LEAFs would lose bars at a constant rate year-round, and, IMO, we would probably have seen (and maybe we soon will see, proving you correct) a higher distribution of Winter bar loss of occurrences in loss in like Hawaii, where the is very little "Winter".
There is also at least one report, IIRC, of a high mileage PNW LEAF that has capacity loss greater than 15%, but that still has 12 bars. Future reports from cooler regions might tend to contradict Nissan's many statements that the capacity bar "gauge error" is "pessimistic" in all circumstances.
IMO, it's a lot easier to see what bar loss is NOT- an accurate report of battery capacity, than to try to determine what exactly is causing what we seem to be seeing, the capacity bars disappearing prematurely in hotter climates, and during the Warmer months only.
WetEV wrote:
The following numbers are made up to explain my point. Suppose the hot weather loss is over reported by 5%, and the winter capacity is exact. In other words, if the car would have lost a bar at 15% if gauge was accurate, it would instead lose a bar at 10% in hot weather. In the cold weather, the bar loss is correctly and accurately at 15%. So if the car almost lose a bar in the summer at 9.9% loss, the car would need to drop to 15% loss to lose a bar in winter. So then with this pattern, there would many bars lost in summer, and none lost in winter.
All we can say from the lack of winter bar losses is that the summer reading is more pessimistic than the winter reading. Which of the two is more accurate isn't clear.