DaveinOlyWA
Well-known member
what is the cell reversal voltage for Li?
derkraut said:In Heaven, we don't need no stinkin' GOM, there won't ever be battery capacity loss; and in Hell, everybody has to drive a Hummer,and refuel it @ $10USA per gallon. :twisted:edatoakrun said:quote="derkraut" I'm a Christian...
Do all LEAFs in heaven, have 12 capacity bars, and an accurate GOM?
And think how fast those lost souls in the fiery pits below, lose capacity bars on their LEAFs.
Maybe even faster than in Phoenix...
Remember that 2.5V is resting voltage, it will and can sag below that under load and be OK. I've taken my LiFePO4 pack down to 1.77V under load a few times and when resting it sprang back to 2.45V and climbing, with no noticeable damage. Not that I recommend doing it on a regular basis.gbarry42 said:If I understand the meaning of "reversal", that would be at 0 volts You are probably asking at what voltage we see significant non-reversible damage. Going by what drees just told us, if they spec it down to 2.5v, that's probably a really good place to stop. In a precisely balanced pack, that would be 240 volts.
JRP3 said:Remember that 2.5V is resting voltage, it will and can sag below that under load and be OK. I've taken my LiFePO4 pack down to 1.77V under load a few times and when resting it sprang back to 2.45V and climbing, with no noticeable damage. Not that I recommend doing it on a regular basis.gbarry42 said:If I understand the meaning of "reversal", that would be at 0 volts You are probably asking at what voltage we see significant non-reversible damage. Going by what drees just told us, if they spec it down to 2.5v, that's probably a really good place to stop. In a precisely balanced pack, that would be 240 volts.
JRP3 said:Remember that 2.5V is resting voltage, it will and can sag below that under load and be OK. I've taken my LiFePO4 pack down to 1.77V under load a few times and when resting it sprang back to 2.45V and climbing, with no noticeable damage. Not that I recommend doing it on a regular basis.gbarry42 said:If I understand the meaning of "reversal", that would be at 0 volts You are probably asking at what voltage we see significant non-reversible damage. Going by what drees just told us, if they spec it down to 2.5v, that's probably a really good place to stop. In a precisely balanced pack, that would be 240 volts.
Sorry, can you elaborate how your car was/is maintained day and night during high temp. Your miles are not that high.1932highboy said:My Leaf lost a bar on 7/28/2012. The car has 11,212 miles and I had its since 5/5/2011. Its never been OC. I called Nissan to report it. My case number is 9074806. The case worker told me to take it to the dealer to have them check it over and also to document it.
Since you've had it more than 12 months ... did you do a battery check at 1-year (in May 2012) ?1932highboy said:My Leaf lost a bar on 7/28/2012. The car has 11,212 miles and I had its since 5/5/2011. Its never been OC. I called Nissan to report it. My case number is 9074806. The case worker told me to take it to the dealer to have them check it over and also to document it.
EdmondLeaf said:With current temps in 110F, I think I have reasonable solution to keep battery in reasonable temp using AC window unit that blow cold air under the car.
Added to Wiki. We just need your city and VIN number (last 5 digits) to complete your entry.1932highboy said:My Leaf lost a bar on 7/28/2012. The car has 11,212 miles and I had its since 5/5/2011. Its never been OC. I called Nissan to report it. My case number is 9074806. The case worker told me to take it to the dealer to have them check it over and also to document it.
1932highboy said:My Leaf lost a bar on 7/28/2012. The car has 11,212 miles and I had its since 5/5/2011. Its never been OC. I called Nissan to report it. My case number is 9074806. The case worker told me to take it to the dealer to have them check it over and also to document it.
Herm said:EdmondLeaf said:With current temps in 110F, I think I have reasonable solution to keep battery in reasonable temp using AC window unit that blow cold air under the car.
Did you rig up a duct to channel the cold air under the car?.. 5000 BTU window AC consume about 500Wh or so when the compressor is running.
Power consumption was somewhere in .8kWH range, I made the duct using pieces of foam and blocked air under the car, car is parked very close to garage door so AC is placed under partially opened garage door insulated with foam whenever possible. Temp at 7 am in garage was 80 but under car and battery 70. Will do it again tonight temp at midnight about 95F.Herm said:EdmondLeaf said:With current temps in 110F, I think I have reasonable solution to keep battery in reasonable temp using AC window unit that blow cold air under the car.
Did you rig up a duct to channel the cold air under the car?.. 5000 BTU window AC consume about 500Wh or so when the compressor is running.
AFAIK ECU's are generally located inside the cabin, not to say that they don't get hot though. If the LEAFs microprocessors/etc. were getting too hot I would expect random glitches, error codes being thrown, rebooting, lock ups, failed components, etc. Not batteries degrading quicker than expected.ztanos said:DaveinOlyWA said:JRP3 said:Highly unlikely, and that it would only damage packs in warm areas makes it even less likely.
unlikely yes. impossible? ooooh no. any computer novice will tell you that heat is a killer. what protects the Nissan pack? computers do. how do computers protect the pack? they monitor various parameters of the pack and provide operations to keep those parameters within predesigned guidelines.
excessive heat can mess up the computer's circuitry to the point that it may no longer measure accurately or respond accurately.
your blanket statement needs a much closer examination
This is true... which is why most datacenters blast the ac at 73 degrees. But since cars have computers in them these days, I would think that the computer isn't the issue. I would think that auto manufacturers have the heat figured out when it comes to the computer, since it has been sitting under ICE hoods for years now. But then again, I may be giving Nissan too much credit. It could be that they needed more processing power to run the LEAF and didn't take into account needing a bigger heatsink. This would be a huge blunder for something so "electric."
Is it important to blow the air from the front of the car (or pull the air out the back) so that flow is from front to back? I'm thinking perhaps the LEAF is designed for flow from front to back to give the best cooling while driving, but I don't know. Anyone know?zarwin said:I have a 10k BTU window unit mounted in the wall of the garage, mainly for when the temp is up in the triple digits and I come home with 7TB on the display (or when I need to work on things in the garage). No duct, I just run a cheap fan to blow the cool air under the car, which seems to work fine. I can feel the heat billowing out from under the car when the fan is on.
RegGuheert said:Is it important to blow the air from the front of the car (or pull the air out the back) so that flow is from front to back? I'm thinking perhaps the LEAF is designed for flow from front to back to give the best cooling while driving, but I don't know. Anyone know?zarwin said:I have a 10k BTU window unit mounted in the wall of the garage, mainly for when the temp is up in the triple digits and I come home with 7TB on the display (or when I need to work on things in the garage). No duct, I just run a cheap fan to blow the cool air under the car, which seems to work fine. I can feel the heat billowing out from under the car when the fan is on.
Enter your email address to join: