If you look at his car comparisons it's clear that all he did when looking at BEVs was to consider the pollution attributable to electrical generation. I won't even bother getting into why treating mass the same way for BEVs and ICEs makes little sense nor why CARB certification isn't a good proxy for emissions much less pollutions. What I will say is that IF he was going to consider the emissions and pollution attributable to refining, at a minimum he would have had to (1) use 36.4 kWh (the higher DOE number) as the energy content of gasoline since that's what you get when you treat gasoline like you do electrical generation and (2) account for refining as being, at most, 85% efficient. If you do that the Leaf gets 126 MPGe. But he uses the EPA number of 99 MPGe. Since this number most certainly does not account for the refining process it's safe to conclude that he is not considering refining in his comparisons and that his "apples to apples" comparison is in fact an "apples to potatoes" comparison.
If you consider that a rant you're entitled to your opinion.