edatoakrun
...And of course, in this range test like any other, be sure to use Carwings to monitor your LEAFs "driver efficiency", which the 2013 S, unfortunately, cannot
="bobsfreeleaf"
Carwings envy
Well, in a range test like you seem to be planning today, relatively flat, at near-constant speed, the difference between the two LEAFs in the amount of regen braking used should be fairly small, so the lack of CW data shouldn't matter
too much.
But it will be informative to test Nissan's claim of increase regen efficiency in the 2013 MY, which only a driving test of a 2013 with CW, compared with any 2011-12, on a more "real world" route (in driving conditions where regen use is more extensive) can tell us.
In fact, I would have little use for CW IF the energy consumption data reported from my LEAF was consistent and reliable, but it is not.
I believe using CW is how 2011-12 LEAF drivers can determine that the nav screen is the "correct" m/kWh number, rather than the dash, and how they can access the slightly more precise kWh use numbers from which both m/kWh reports are calculated.
You have only the one one m/kWh report, from the dash, right? And
hopefully, has been corrected in the 2013 MY.
You may want to look at my own LEAFs range test history, using a very different methodology than you have planned for today, that I have posted here:
http://www.mynissanleaf.com/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=9064" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;