smkettner
Well-known member
OK and how many lost miles in 26 mV?
Looks like the low pair has a shunt at the low end of spec driving it low.ebill3 said:If using the default color scheme, red denotes shunts in use. Why so many shunts active, even on low cell pairs?
ebill3 said:If using the default color scheme, red denotes shunts in use. Why so many shunts active, even on low cell pairs?
gbarry42 said:...
But when that one weak cell reaches the official lower limit (~3.6 V) the controller will declare that you're done for the day.
Computerizer said:OP here. I drove it down pretty low (25 Gids), about 0.3 miles until VLBW. LBW happened exactly when the app predicted.
Except for the following:gbarry42 said:If that cell has a higher resistance than normal, the voltage should not be significantly lower in an open circuit measurement (which we probably can't do), and not much different at idle.
Higher internal resistance will cause the terminal voltages of that cell to be higher while charging, even though the cell may be at a lower SOC. But when you make a measurement at idle, the internal resistance has little effect, since the current is near zero, and the voltage then reflects the actual SOC.gbarry42 said:... it should be higher when being charged.
If the extra internal resistance is high enough, it can potentially cause that cell-pair to have a high voltage while charging and thus to be shunted, even though it may be at a lower SOC. When shunted, the cell-pair may then show up as having the lowest voltage. Since the prime directive for the BMS is to prevent overcharging of any cell, it has no choice but to shunt high-voltage cells, even if that then makes them low-voltage cells.ebill3 said:If using the default color scheme, red denotes shunts in use. Why so many shunts active, even on low cell pairs?
As expected, this charge has brought all of the cell-pair voltages to within 20 mV of each other. It's possible that the BMS is incapable of achieving this level of balance on your pack when charging at L2 rates.Computerizer said:The difference on that cell pair is much less noticeable at the higher charge levels.
Max cell-pair is the one which will stop charging at the high end and min cell-pair is the one which will stop discharging on the low end.DaveinOlyWA said:Why min max? It should be min avg if anything.
essaunders said:I have one of those on my 2012 too.
<edited to add a picture I found>
never been over 6 bars temp, no QC, 80% charge normal.
I'm not holding out much hope the dealer would find much. Does anyone have guidance on how much voltage delta would warrant action by Nissan? This is only 25mV from average to low.
Computerizer said:A loss of 3 kWh over about 4000 miles of driving does not sound right at all.
surfingslovak said:Computerizer said:A loss of 3 kWh over about 4000 miles of driving does not sound right at all.
Are you observing this on the 2012 or 2013 LEAF?
Computerizer said:As requested (sorry I forgot to post this), here are screenshots of the battery graphs roughly every 10% from full charge down to 30%.
http://imgur.com/a/1qS7F
That one cell pair is the lowest at almost all times, but I guess it's not really THAT low.
Why is my capacity so low (93%) given that this cell isn't actually so bad, the car only has 8,000 miles on it, and battery temperature is in the 60s?
Yeah, looks pretty normal. About 20mV all the way down to 30% SOC. Things won't really get interesting until you get down to ~20% (LBW) or lower.Computerizer said:As requested (sorry I forgot to post this), here are screenshots of the battery graphs roughly every 10% from full charge down to 30%.
http://imgur.com/a/1qS7F
That one cell pair is the lowest at almost all times, but I guess it's not really THAT low.
Why is my capacity so low (93%) given that this cell isn't actually so bad, the car only has 8,000 miles on it, and battery temperature is in the 60s?
Enter your email address to join: