Autonomous Vehicles, LEAF and others...

My Nissan Leaf Forum

Help Support My Nissan Leaf Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Robotaxi haters in San Francisco are disabling the AVs with traffic cones
https://techcrunch.com/2023/07/06/robotaxi-haters-in-san-francisco-are-disabling-waymo-cruise-traffic-cones

Grumpy Locals Are Sabotaging Cruise and Waymo Robotaxis With Traffic Cones
Think of it like a dunce cap, but for a car.
https://www.thedrive.com/news/rebels-are-disabling-waymo-cruise-robotaxis-with-traffic-cones

These guys put a cones on the hood of the above vehicles.
 
Cruise cars cause traffic jam in San Francisco's North Beach neighborhood
The incident comes on the heels of a California Public Utilities Commission ruling this week, giving robotaxis the green light to expand services in San Francisco.
https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/cruise-cars-standstill-traffic-san-francisco-north-beach/3294264/
 
DougWantsALeaf said:
Progress is a bumpy road

Sure, the issue in this case is whether that progress should be allowed expansion on public roads at this stage, when there are public safety issues. Both the police and firefighters reps testified at the PUC hearing about instances where they were unable to respond quickly due to these vehicles blocking traffic, and being unable to get them to move. Still, I much prefer the fact that this rollout by Cruise, Waymo etc. has taken as long as it has because it is being regulated through state and local public hearings and governmental review, i.e. the normal (and IMO) absolutely necessary public safety consent process.

Compare this to Tesla, which simply decided to put members of the public at risk from Autopilot/FSD without asking them (members of the general public, through their government representatives and regulatory agencies, since asking each individual is impossible) if it was okay, or having any indication that the cars might be driving themselves. NHTSA showed how it shouldn't be done with Tesla, essentially giving them a free pass with no pre-release or subsequent expansion review at all, until quite recently. There's still almost no federal regulation of ADAS systems, despite NTSB repeatedly pointing out the safety issues and the need for such regulation for years [see https://www.mynissanleaf.com/viewtopic.php?p=633216#p633216]. This sort of governmental review process may be slow and cumbersome, but is absolutely the way to go when public safety is at issue. 'Public' consent should be mandatory in such cases, not something any company can ignore if they wish.

Note that I'm fully in favor of developing autonomous vehicles, as we have an aging population plus now an entire generation of drivers who've grown up thinking that looking at/interacting with their cell phones is their first priority, and watching the road/driving their car comes second (or lower). But any such development/deployment has to be done with the primary emphasis on public safety, not company convenience/profit or the desire of individuals to have the latest tech.
 
We recently caravaned our Rogue and one of Leaf to Kansas. I have to say, the updated Propilot on the Rogue did quite well, with only 2 interventions in the highway driving over the nearly 600 miles.

I am curious to see how the autonomous wars play out with Cruise now 24/7 in San Fran and Tesla getting pretty close with FSD. Guessing robo taxis are only a couple years away from hitting most major metros. I wonder how Uber will adjust.
 
DougWantsALeaf said:
We recently caravaned our Rogue and one of Leaf to Kansas. I have to say, the updated Propilot on the Rogue did quite well, with only 2 interventions in the highway driving over the nearly 600 miles.

I am curious to see how the autonomous wars play out with Cruise now 24/7 in San Fran and Tesla getting pretty close with FSD. Guessing robo taxis are only a couple years away from hitting most major metros. I wonder how Uber will adjust.

They're salivating - the driver is the most expensive part of their operation. As for me, I'll continue to refuse to use any ADAS system until such time as the manufacturer is willing to assume full legal liability for any accident the car gets into while driving itself, that a normally alert human driver would avoid. Until they no longer crash into stationary emergency vehicles with their flashing lights on, and similar dumb but easily avoidable accidents, count me out. They need to be significantly safer than humans for widespread deployment - until then they've got no business being on public roads except in limited, carefully monitored trials, with slow expansion of use as their demonstrated capabilities improve. Which is what Cruise and Waymo have been engaged in.

Whether the CPUC's decision was the correct one remains to be seen, and ultimately public acceptance or rejection will be the final decision. Putting traffic cones on self-driving car's hoods to bring them to a confused stop is just a more extreme way for members of the public to indicate they don't think the cars (and their human support system) are ready for primetime.
 
Cruise vehicle gets stuck in wet concrete while driving in San Francisco
https://www.sfgate.com/tech/article/cruise-stuck-wet-concrete-sf-18297946.php
 
Too bad it didn't happen in New York or New Jersey - with its new concrete tires (overshoes), they could have sent it to sleep with the fishes (cue other Godfather memes - if only it had been carrying a firearm and Italian pastry) :lol:
 
Cruise told by regulators to ‘immediately’ reduce robotaxi fleet 50% following crash
https://techcrunch.com/2023/08/18/cruise-told-by-regulators-to-immediately-reduce-robotaxi-fleet-50-following-crash/

There were 2 incidents on Thursday: https://www.sfchronicle.com/sf/article/cruise-driverless-san-francisco-crash-18302845.php.
 
GRA said:
As for me, I'll continue to refuse to use any ADAS system until such time as the manufacturer is willing to assume full legal liability for any accident the car gets into while driving itself, that a normally alert human driver would avoid. Until they no longer crash into stationary emergency vehicles with their flashing lights on, and similar dumb but easily avoidable accidents, count me out.

Another example, via IEVS:
Watch Tesla Model 3 Dive Into Flood Water While Running On FSD Beta

Both the driver and the FSD Beta system ignored a "Flooded" sign.
https://insideevs.com/news/682776/watch-tesla-model-3-dive-flood-water-running-fsd-beta/
 
https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/cruise-car-involved-san-francisco-crash/3303566/
"A driverless car and a construction vehicle were involved in a crash in San Francisco Thursday night, sources told NBC Bay Area.

The incident happened at around 9:20 p.m. on Gough Street near Geary.

According to sources, a Cruise car and a construction vehicle were driving southbound on Gough street near Geary, when the cruise car was in a middle lane when it tried to make a left turn on Starr King Way.

That's when the robotaxi crashed into a construction backhoe."
 
This was on local news tonight.

Cruise pushes back against claims from the SF fire department
https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/cruise-pushes-back-claims-sf-fire-department/3309336/

https://www.kron4.com/news/bay-area/san-francisco-pedestrian-died-after-cruise-cars-blocked-ambulance-sffd/ has less detail about also discusses some other incidents.
 
I have been driving daily using FSD Beta for six months . I am impressed how it performs on narrow unmarked country lanes. It seems to be quite flawless on Interstates. It costs me $200 monthly. Hopefully version 12 will be out early 2024. At age 72 due to arthritis I can't get in and out of a Model 3 but the Y is doable.
 
The software looks remarkable. How does it perform in heavy rain/snow?

I am loving the coming battle between Cruise/Waymo and FSD from Tesla as they have very different approaches. With additional metros popping on the Cruise repertoire, it feels like Tesla recognizes they need to get to full hands free sooner.

Truth is there is room for both solutions.


While I don't put Propilot in the same league/century as those solutions, my wife already complains that she wishes the propilot could do the rest of the driving for her instead of just the highway.
 
Driverless Cruise car attacked by person with hammer
https://www.ktvu.com/news/driverless-cruise-car-attacked-by-person-with-hammer - there is a video
 
‘Never happen in New York’: SF tourists embrace controversial ride
https://www.sfgate.com/travel/article/sf-tourists-ride-av-taxi-waymo-cruise-18392764.php
 
Back
Top