Nissan LEAF Update from Andy Palmer

My Nissan Leaf Forum

Help Support My Nissan Leaf Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Hawk0630

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2012
Messages
20
This is Jeff from Nissan.

Today I'm bringing you a note from Andy Palmer, Executive Vice President, Nissan Motor Company. In this letter, Andy addresses issues that you – LEAF owners and members of the mynissanleaf.com community – have brought to us through the forum, discussions and our dealers.

The first thing about this note is that it is formal, to say the least. I understand this, as does Andy. In his note to me earlier this morning, he said that it was “understandably formal”, but he asked if we could provide a more friendly and engaging introduction (that's what I'm attempting to do here). I hope that you can appreciate why the letter is in the more “formal” style. It has to be. We live in a world where every word is parsed and dissected by lawyers and regulators. Andy is addressing issues in this note that relate to regulated and contractual matters, issues that are regulated by hundreds of different organizations in the various countries where we sell the Nissan LEAF. That said, understand that Andy has signed this note.

The second thing about this note is what it is not. It is not a notice for any owner to take action at this time. In this letter, Andy announces changes to Nissan’s LEAF warranty coverage that will go into effect during the Spring of 2013. Why does it take so long to implement the changes? It will take time to formally notify each customer, as is necessary by regulation in most, if not all of the countries where we sell the LEAF. Also, we need to insure that every dealer is prepared to welcome and assist a customer when they arrive at the dealership.

Finally, in this note Andy does not attempt to address every question that you have raised. Foremost, he wants to announce the warranty changes that will be coming in the next few months. He realizes that there are other issues to address.

I want to take this opportunity to announce that we will host an open house in the Phoenix area on Tuesday, January 8th. I am working with Tim Gallagher, who I think most of the west coast MNL people know well, to arrange this event. I will come back to you shortly with the details, but you can count on Andy Palmer attending, as will Billy Hayes, the newly appointed Vice President of Global Sales for the Nissan LEAF. Tim, Dave Reuter and I also will be there. Just as a heads up, this may be a breakfast event due to the various schedules that we’re attempting to juggle. If so, we would start at around 8 or 8:30 a.m. Let me know your thoughts on that. Tentative location is the Valley Ho in Scottsdale. Tim will have a quick charger on hand for those who require it.

In line with the Phoenix event, Chelsea – as a part of her advisory board efforts – has asked a few member to help ensure that the right questions are asked. I believe that Tony Williams and Phil Sadow are among those she is working with on that topic.

I didn’t intend for this “introduction” to be so long, but I think that we had a number of issues to cover. Below is Andy’s note. I look forward to your comments on it, on the event and on other issues that you would like to bring to me.

Let me close with my best wishes to every one for a happy and health New Year.

Cheers!

Jeff

______________________________________________________
Special announcement regarding the Nissan LEAF
from Andy Palmer, executive vice president, Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.


Good morning and Happy Holidays to all our Nissan LEAF owners in the U.S. and abroad.

As we approach the close of 2012, I wanted to provide an update on a subject that has interested a number of Nissan LEAF drivers in the U.S. desert southwest and select other markets. I’m speaking, of course, about concerns regarding the rate of battery capacity loss in the Nissan LEAF’s Lithium-ion battery.

My comments today will be specific to Nissan LEAFs in the U.S., but the actions I will explain will apply and be specifically communicated to each owner worldwide in the coming months in accordance with applicable law.

Throughout the latter half of this year, our technical teams have worked diligently to ensure that the batteries installed in Nissan LEAFs were operating to specification. As we’ve gone through this process, we have listened to your concerns, and have communicated with you in various ways, including through the MyNissanLEAF owners’ forum and other third parties.

Nissan has been taking your concerns very seriously, yet we know that some of you have not been satisfied with the pace of our support activities. Since launch, the Nissan LEAF has garnered some of the highest customer advocacy of any vehicle in the Nissan lineup, so we understand the importance of maintaining and growing that advocacy. And the only way to do that is by earning a high level of customer trust in our product and our support of it.

Simply put, we want to take actions which will further improve our customers’ satisfaction with their Nissan LEAFs while demonstrating industry-leading confidence in the integrity of our battery system. Nissan is fully committed to the long-term viability of electric vehicles and we will continue to demonstrate that with action.

So today, we are announcing that we are enhancing the warranty coverage of the battery system that powers the Nissan LEAF electric vehicle. With this action, Nissan becomes the first and only manufacturer in the automotive industry to provide limited warranty coverage for battery capacity loss for electric vehicles.

Under an expanded New Electric Vehicle Limited Warranty, Nissan will protect against capacity loss in LEAF batteries that fall below nine bars, of the available 12 bars displayed on the vehicle’s battery capacity gauge, for the first five years or 60,000 miles in the United States, whichever comes first. For LEAF vehicles whose batteries have fallen below nine bars during this period, Nissan will repair or replace the battery under warranty with a new or remanufactured battery to restore capacity at or above a minimum of nine bars.

A vehicle whose battery has nine remaining bars indicated on the gauge is retaining approximately 70 percent of its original battery capacity. This new limited warranty coverage remains subject to the other terms, conditions and exclusions of the Nissan New Electric Vehicle Limited Warranty, which otherwise remain unchanged.

As previously mentioned, we are also looking at opportunities to improve the precision of the battery capacity gauge that displays remaining capacity in the LEAFs electric vehicle battery, and intend to have more to report on this topic in the New Year.

The specifics of this new limited warranty coverage will be communicated to each owner in a dedicated communication early next year. The expanded warranty coverage will apply in the United States to the upcoming Model Year 2013 Nissan LEAF upon its release. Importantly, Nissan will provide this expanded coverage to all model year 2011 and 2012 Nissan LEAFs sold and distributed by Nissan in the United States to date, effective upon a date to be announced but which is anticipated to be in the Spring of 2013.

Our actions today are intended to put customer minds at ease regarding the topic of battery capacity loss. Even though it is expected the great majority of owners will never have to use this enhanced warranty, we want each Nissan LEAF owner to have the security that should capacity loss exceed this defined threshold, Nissan will cover the repair or replacement of their battery under warranty.

I’m certain that there will be questions regarding the specifics of what we’ve announced here today. The attached ‘Q&A’ is intended to address some of those, although our dialogue on this subject will not end here. We intend to continue communicating with LEAF owners and we hope to add more information early in the New Year.

Also, many of you may have heard about or already read a recent LEAF customer survey that Plug-In America (PIA) administered. The survey, available here, is a valuable read for any LEAF owner concerned about the performance of their electric vehicle battery. I would encourage every LEAF owner to digest PIA’s data, which came from over 240 vehicles, with contributions from over 25 states, two Canadian provinces, and the UK, representing over 3 million miles driven.

Finally, in early January, we will also announce the details of the new, model year 2013 Nissan LEAF for the U.S. As many of you know, this vehicle – and the batteries that power it – will be built right here in the United States at our plant in Smyrna, Tennessee. There are exciting changes coming with the 2013 Nissan LEAF, and we can’t wait to tell you about them very soon.

In the meantime, Happy New Year to each of you, and thank you again for your advocacy and support of the electric vehicle movement.


Best Regards,

Andy Palmer
Executive Vice President – Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.
 
This is Jeff from Nissan ... again.

I'd like to attached a Q&A to Andy's letter that I was unable to do in the above. I may have created too long of a post. Apologize for the inconvenience.

Jeff

_________________________________________________

Expanded New Electric Vehicle Limited Warranty
‘Question & Answer’



Q. What does the LEAF’s Expanded “Nissan New Electric Vehicle Limited Warranty” actually cover?
A. In addition to the coverage provided under the existing Nissan New Electric Vehicle Limited Warranty, this expanded warranty applicable to LEAF vehicles in the United States will protect against capacity loss in LEAF batteries that falls below nine bars, of the available 12 bars displayed on the vehicle’s battery capacity gauge, for the first 5 years or 60,000 miles, whichever comes first. For LEAF vehicles whose batteries have fallen below nine bars during this period, Nissan will repair or replace the battery under warranty with a new or remanufactured battery to restore capacity at or above a minimum of nine bars. A vehicle whose battery has nine remaining bars indicated on the gauge is retaining approximately 70 percent of its original battery capacity, although remember that the rate of capacity loss is non-linear and decreases over time.


Q. What vehicles are covered by this new limited warranty coverage? Will this warranty be retroactive for existing owners?
A. The expanded warranty coverage will apply in the United States to the upcoming Model Year 2013 Nissan LEAF upon its release. Importantly, Nissan will provide this expanded coverage to all model year 2011 and 2012 Nissan LEAFs sold and distributed by Nissan in the United States to date, effective upon a date to be announced but which is anticipated to be in the Spring of 2013. This new limited warranty coverage remains subject to the other terms, conditions and exclusions of the Nissan New Electric Vehicle Limited Warranty, which otherwise remain unchanged.


Q. Does the warranty cover replacement or refurbishment?
A. This warranty covers any repairs needed to return battery capacity to a level of nine remaining bars on the vehicle’s battery capacity level gauge. If possible, the Lithium-Ion battery components will be repaired or replaced, and the original Lithium-Ion battery will be returned to the vehicle. If necessary, the Lithium-Ion battery will be replaced with either a new or remanufactured Lithium-Ion battery. Any repair or replacement made under this Lithium-Ion Battery Capacity Coverage may not return a Lithium-Ion battery to an “as new” condition with all 12 battery capacity bars, but it will provide the vehicle with a capacity level of nine bars or more on the battery capacity level gauge.


Q. Why doesn’t the warranty restore the battery to the same level as a brand new one?
A. Gradual capacity loss is normal and expected in all lithium-ion batteries with time and use. The intent of this warranty is to provide consumers with confidence that despite this normal battery capacity loss, they will be assured of a minimum level of capacity throughout the warranty period.


Q. Is there an option for an owner to replace the battery? Is there a price for replacement?
A. Nissan is confident this new warranty will ensure customer satisfaction, but we also plan to release battery replacement pricing for those customers who wish to replace their batteries once they are no longer eligible for the warranty. Further details will be announced at a later timing in spring of 2013.


Q. What is the cost of the replacement battery?
A. We will announce further details before implementation.


Q. When does this new warranty coverage go into effect?
A. This expanded warranty will apply to Model Year 2013 LEAFs upon their release for sale by United States Nissan dealers. The date on which this new warranty coverage becomes effective for Model Year 2011 and 2012 Nissan LEAF vehicles will be announced in the future, effective upon a date to be announced but which is anticipated to be in the Spring of 2013, to allow for proper implementation by Nissan and its network of certified LEAF dealers.


Q. Why did you decide to enhance the warranty policy and implement this program now?
A. The expanded warranty is intended to put customers’ minds at ease concerning battery capacity loss, although it is expected that the great majority of LEAF owners will not have to use this enhanced warranty. Nissan’s decision is to demonstrate its confidence in the integrity and performance of its battery system.


Q. What is the status of the class-action lawsuit against Nissan related to battery capacity issues?
A. The lawsuit has been settled as part of our effort to address customer concerns including those expressed by the two customers who filed the class-action lawsuit.


Q. What are the other countries where this warranty policy will apply?
A. Further details will be announced in spring of 2013, but in addition to the United States we do plan to include other global markets such as Japan and Europe.


Q. Why are you waiting until spring of 2013 for implementation of this warranty as it applies to Model Year 2011 and 2012 vehicles?
A. Providing prompt and effective warranty service requires proper planning and preparation by our parts and service division working closely with our network of certified LEAF dealers.


Q. What should customers do if the gauge falls below 9 bars?
A. Customers who believe that their vehicle battery may need repair or replacement should visit their nearest certified Nissan LEAF dealer. Additional details on the warranty and repair process will be provided in spring 2013.


Q. How does the frequency of fast charging affect the rate of capacity loss? Are there other factors that influence the rate of capacity loss?
A. Quick charging the vehicle more than one time a day will affect and may hasten the rate of battery capacity loss. Other factors that will affect and may hasten the rate of capacity loss include, but are not limited to: (1) Sustained high battery temperatures (caused, for example, by exposure to very high ambient temperatures or extending highway driving with multiple quick charges); (2) Sustained high battery state of charge (caused, for example, by frequently charging to 100% state of charge and/or leaving the battery above 80% state of charge for long periods of time); and (3) Higher than estimated annual mileage accumulation (such as more than 12,500 miles per year).
 
An interesting read. Its definitely a start. Personally, I think they should break it down more.. Such guarantee 10 bars for the first 20,000 miles, then 9 bars after that. I know if I had a Leaf for just one year and it dropped to 9 bars I'd be pretty irritated that I'd have to wait for it to fall below that before anything could be done.
 
adric22 said:
An interesting read. Its definitely a start. Personally, I think they should break it down more.. Such guarantee 10 bars for the first 20,000 miles, then 9 bars after that. I know if I had a Leaf for just one year and it dropped to 9 bars I'd be pretty irritated that I'd have to wait for it to fall below that before anything could be done.

And don't forget, once it falls under 9 bars under this new warranty they would only have to bring it "up to" 9 bars.

I agree it's better than nothing, but a 9 bar warranty is particularly feeble here IMO.
 
I applaud Nissan for stepping up with a real warranty on the most expensive component in their electric car! Thank you!

I do have a concern though, with "bars" being the unit of measurement. Obviously the bars representation are controlled by the onboard computer and can be changed arbitrarily -- as was already done once with an early firmware update.

What assurance will the customer have that re-calibration of the display is not a loophole? Will the warranty also be expressed in some standard units, for example Kilowatt-hours?

Once again, thanks. This is a great step towards wider adoption of electric vehicles.
 
z0ner said:
adric22 said:
An interesting read. Its definitely a start. Personally, I think they should break it down more.. Such guarantee 10 bars for the first 20,000 miles, then 9 bars after that. I know if I had a Leaf for just one year and it dropped to 9 bars I'd be pretty irritated that I'd have to wait for it to fall below that before anything could be done.

And don't forget, once it falls under 9 bars under this new warranty they would only have to bring it "up to" 9 bars.

I agree it's better than nothing, but a 9 bar warranty is particularly feeble here IMO.

Certainly it's a wise move, because the actual exposure to Nissan is extremely small and it makes them look like they are proactive.

Granted, they appear to have settled at least one class action (that in my opinion was poorly executed by the plaintiff's counsel), there will obviously be some unsatisfied consumers who were never told that 70.1% capacity is ok, regardless of when it happens after the sale. While those folks may file complaints (and sue), Nissan has given themselves very low cost defense in such cases.

Bottom line; 99.9% of current LEAF owners have no claim under this warranty, Nissan won't buy back any more cars (since you're covered), and consumers will largely be in "status quo ante".

Great maneuvering Nissan !!!! Now, they can keep pumping out exactly the same car in Phoenix, get exactly the same results, and pay virtually nothing. Bravo.

I don't want anybody to think I'm Debbie Downer on this; I actually applaud the move that let's prospective owners know the limits.
 
Very reasonable response by Nissan, IMO.

But I also believe it would be very wise for Nissan to announce the replacement price in April, rather than June...

Q. Is there an option for an owner to replace the battery? Is there a price for replacement?
A. Nissan is confident this new warranty will ensure customer satisfaction, but we also plan to release battery replacement pricing for those customers who wish to replace their batteries once they are no longer eligible for the warranty. Further details will be announced at a later timing in spring of 2013.


Q. What is the cost of the replacement battery?
A. We will announce further details before implementation.
 
Q. What is the status of the class-action lawsuit against Nissan related to battery capacity issues?
A. The lawsuit has been settled as part of our effort to address customer concerns including those expressed by the two customers who filed the class-action lawsuit.

i wonder what the settlement is?
where can we learn about that.

also, does the warranty ensure that the restoration of 9 bars is not done by changing software or resetting the coding; rather that the software on the car will be left intact so that it is true restoration.

i applaud that we are getting some corporate response to value us as consumers and, as well, to place a floor on the value of our vehicles. this will stabilize used car prices to some extent.
I am an owner who intends to keep his vehicle for at least 100k miles and eight years. folks such as myself will all know allot more this spring about how to assess and value this step when replacement battery pricing is announced.

that said, i think a 10 bar reset would be a much better set point, as that correlates to the standard of charging that is recommended for long life of a new vehicle.
i would be far far more comfortable with that and recommend it either as a basic warranty or one that you can buy as an add on.
 
TonyWilliams said:
Great maneuvering Nissan !!!! Now, they can keep pumping out exactly the same car in Phoenix, get exactly the same results, and pay virtually nothing. Bravo.
I'm not sure I follow you here, Tony. It appears to me that they will need to pay to maintain the LEAFs in Phoenix above 70% capacity until they reach 5 years or 60,000 miles.
 
I agree that this is a good first step.

A couple of years of history suggest that only those U.S. LEAF owners in the desert southwest, Texas, South Florida and Hawaii may see battery degradation which exceeds the new, proposed warranty, and even in those cases, they will have a guarantee to retain at least 70% capacity through 60,000 miles or five years, whichever comes first. Since those LEAF owners represent just a small fraction of the total LEAF owners in the U.S., it seems like a reasonable business decision on Nissan' part.

However, it doesn't change my view that LEAFs should be lease-only in hot climates (like the ones I mentioned above). And, if you are someone in a hot climate, who puts so many miles a year on a car that a lease isn't a viable choice, I'd skip the LEAF entirely.
 
I will be interested to see how the fine print reads. I would also like to see how they will sustain adding fractional capacity to a pack that has linear degradation vs one with say a defective module, fractional could lead to a stop-gap fix that holds the pack to the warranty level until the warranty expires. One module in the weak link could give a small boost to capacity and holds the car there for a brief time at the edge of the warranty or requires frequent return visits over a few years. Time will tell.

I'm a bit shy of 2 years and 10K miles and stil have 280-281 Gids. This is at least a reference point to use for worst-case senario for high-heat areas.
 
as a public relations and customer support program, it would be far better for Nissan to guarantee a 10 bar capacity under warranty as it is already a standard the Nissan itself uses in ALL LEAF material and has set as the standard of charging that is recommended for long life of a new vehicle.

in my view, the newly announced and proposed warranty fails for that reason as a public relations and customer support standard.
 
Wouldn't a TMS have been a better fix moving forward. So using this logic if I had an ICE vehicle and the engine blew under warrantee Nissan would replace engine with a used one that had 50k miles on it. WTF.
Nice job Nissan!!
 
I would hope that Nissan would aim to replace as few batteries under warranty as possible just due to labor and shipping costs, so it wouldn't make much sense to replace an end-of-life battery with a refurbished one that was so near end-of-life that it had to be replaced again in a couple of months.
 
downeykp said:
Wouldn't a TMS have been a better fix moving forward. So using this logic if I had an ICE vehicle and the engine blew under warrantee Nissan would replace engine with a used one that had 50k miles on it. WTF.
Nice job Nissan!!


Your analogy does not make sense. Car makers do not warranty levels of wear on an ICE but if something fails they wil fix that. If Nissan warranties a capacity level then they need to only restore it to that level. If the warranty says they wil restore it to 100% should it drop to 70% then they need to do that, the coverage does not say that however. If one buys an EV knowing they wil get "X" capacity for a certain term then that seems quite clear. It was quite clear what was covered before, no capacity. I am sure some people will expect this new warranty will cover a full 100% no mater what they read or sign, that's almost a given. Consumers should read the warranty before buying a product and not "assume" coverage is implied.

The pack design was a business/engineering decision that may still make perfect sense for this application.
 
Glad I was able to get out of my Leaf when I did. I would not have leased my Leaf if this warranty was disclosed back in early 2011. I won't be buying or leasing a new Leaf as a result of this warranty. I would need a capacity v. time curve to know what I can count on month by month. At least future buyers will know what to expect when buying a Leaf, other than a replacement pack cost. Let's hope Nissan announces the cost for a battery pack sooner rather than later. Disclosure might shrink the pie of potential buyers, but it should result in fewer dissatisfied owners. Good luck Nissan! I still hope they'll get the Leaf right one of these years so I can buy one since I did like it while I drove it for 18 months.
 
This is great if you live in Seattle and want an extra feeling of security. This does absolutely nothing to address the underlying problem of Leafs in hot spots and the lack of a TMS. I've seen one car below nine bars, and it had 45 miles on the GOM at 100% charge; at that point my wife would barely be able to complete her 25-26 mile commute. This was a carefully crafted offer to essentially give nothing, but come out looking generous. So if I reach 8 bars you only have to boost me back to 9?

No thanks. I'll be calling Nissan today.
 
so you could technically drive your batteries down as much as your commute allows and then get boosted to 9 bars. I think it's a fair deal and better then no warranty at all. I wonder if others will follow Nissan and offer some sort of capacity warranty.
 
Back
Top