RegGuheert
Well-known member
Stoaty said:Those other scientists must have been napping when that happened. Reg, you really do have a soft spot for the under dog.
klapauzius said:That didnt really come as a surprise.
Lets stick with AGW.
Even Donald didnt want to touch this topic, which scores him some points in my book... :lol:
Thanks for proving my point, guys!AndyH said:Well, hell - not much of a parade with only one clown car.
As for you, Klap, I'll tell you the same thing I tell my cat when she drops a tailless newt on the living room floor: Don't play with your food. :lol:
Just like with CAGW, you guys parrot the consensus view without even looking at the evidence that I have provided. This is exactly what I expected from a bunch of posters who believe science is about consensus, not facts. It shows clearly that consensus science can and does go wrong. The fact that you guys cannot see past the consensus by actually looking at what the scientific literature says is just more evidence that following the consensus does not give you an answer to a scientific question.
I will say it again. If you have the evidence that cold fusion cannot and does not happen, please post it.
What's funny about Stoaty posting this excerpt from Wikipedia is that Dr. Peter Hagelstein has captured the Wikipedia entries for cold fusion for the past few years. At the very beginning of the MIT 20-hour course he read them, verbatim, after saying "The place to start is Wikipedia, of course," After he read them he then mockingly excused the class. Then throughout the 20-hour course, as he shows the research findings through the last quarter century he occasionally mocks (in a nice way) what he had read at the beginning from Wikipedia. He explained that a cold-fusion researcher who had been maintaining the Wikipedia article was banned and the article was rewritten so that the consensus could be maintained.Stoaty said:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LENR
Like you, the author of the Wikipedia article really hasn't looked closely at the science or the literature concerning cold fusion.