Stoaty
Well-known member
I added Hilo, HI at 1.42 (Weatherman - 1.34), Syracuse, NY at 0.69. A, Montreal, Canada at 0.63 and Lisbon, Portugal at 0.95. Any last requests for cities not in the table?
I wasn't going to bother you with this, but now that you ask, how about Big Bear Lake, CA? :mrgreen:Stoaty said:Any last requests for cities not in the table?
Stoaty said:I added Hilo, HI at 1.42 (Weatherman - 1.34), Syracuse, NY at 0.69. A, Montreal, Canada at 0.63 and Lisbon, Portugal at 0.95. Any last requests for cities not in the table?
Weatherspark data gives 0.59 (still beats Olympia, WA). I will get to the other cities requested in the next couple of days as time allows.Weatherman said:Big Bear City, based on hourly data from 9/1/2007 to 9/1/2012: 0.54
You beat Olympia, WA on my list.
Stoaty said:I will get to the other cities requested in the next couple of days as time allows.
PS You data addicts are as bad as I am!
September said:Shannon, Ireland and Dublin, Ireland
Weatherman said:September said:Shannon, Ireland and Dublin, Ireland
Based on hourly data..
Shannon - 0.58
Dublin - 0.54
Very much like western Washington State in the U.S.
Stoaty said:OK, here are the requested cities:
Shannon, Ireland - 0.61
Dublin, Ireland - 0.58
Talk about the luck of the Irish!
Wiki updated.
Stoaty said:OK, here are the requested cities:
Norfolk, VA - 1.01
Porto, Portugal - 0.81
Shannon, Ireland - 0.61
Dublin, Ireland - 0.58
Talk about the luck of the Irish!
Wiki updated.
While we don't know for sure whether that number applies equally to calendar loss and cycling loss, as a rough approximation I would say that is correct. We'll be checking in with you in another 4-5 years to see how our prediction is working out.vegastar said:Thank you! Is it correct that in the case of Porto, a degradation rate of 0.81 means my Leaf will be at 80% capacity in 5 years / 0.81 = 6.17 years? This assuming the 12500 miles per annum (17k miles actually...).
Those standard deviation numbers are degrees Celsius?Weatherman said:Since there's an argument that temperature stability is an important factor to consider in battery aging, in other words, locations with huge swings from hot to cold will suffer far more than those with stable warm temperatures, I thought I'd list the standard deviation of hourly temperatures for the "warm" locations on my list (the argument, of course, is that bigger is badder):
Dallas/Ft. Worth - 9.9C
Phoenix - 9.8C
Houston - 8.2C
Orlando - 6.4C
Hong Kong - 5.8C
Ft. Lauderdale - 4.9C
Hilo - 2.9C
Honolulu - 2.7C
With the addition of Big Bear City at 0.59 and with Phoenix at 1.81, we now have a full range of battery aging factors within the U.S. of over 3:1 per this model.Stoaty said:Weatherspark data gives 0.59 (still beats Olympia, WA).Weatherman said:Big Bear City, based on hourly data from 9/1/2007 to 9/1/2012: 0.54
You beat Olympia, WA on my list.
Enter your email address to join: