mwalsh said:LakeLeaf said:One speculation -
they may feel pressure to delivery *something* in 2010, but already know that they will have to recall those first deliveries, so don't want too many cars out there to be reworked....
Any further speculation on what they might be needing a recall for? Thinking that notion through a bit, surely it could only be for an engineering problem that they don't expect to have a solution for in the near term? Otherwise, why not just fix the few cars they plan on delivering as they go out the door?
Hey Michael,
I figured after we talked this afternoon Michael there was probably a thread rolling on this subject here, and would check it out.
Kind of funny that I had been working a couple days on this, trying to get confirmation before doing a story from Nissan (I hate reporting something out of context...or just flat wrong, they would probably not like that much ether, heeh), and had not heard anthing really. Truth be told, I actually had gotten a 'GM special' -- "stay tuned" which I thought was amusing.
I ended up just saying to Nissan that I was going to roll with the story as I understood it from random PMs back and forth (so they would have a heads up), and Nissan just now responded, which is kind of nice.
Working the piece a little now, but probably won't get it up until later this evening (maybe 10-11 PST)
Just thought I would say that there is nothing so serious as a recall or engineering crisis (huZZah) but they did confirm parts of it.
EDIT: to appease the time cops