SanDust said:
The rebate will reduce your basis but I don't see how it would be income. It's like getting a rebate on a consumer electronic purchase. You pay X and get a lesser amount back. Since you're net negative on payments where would the income come from?
If you go down to Frys ... buy a hard drive that costs $100 ... and you have a rebate coupon for $100 ... guess what ... you STILL pay sales tax. It's not income tax that you pay.
Jimmydreams said:
EVDRIVER said:
It does not matter if they send out a 1099 nor does it matter what a CARB lawyer says since they don't write the tax law, enforce or interpret it. What the IRS and FTB say is what matters. Ultimately it is what they say in writing that covers you, not even what they say on the phone to be really precise. I'm not saying someone at CARB may have a written answer but they don't decide what you owe. I have yet to see a definitive answer from the IRS on this, even the tax specialist I called could not give me one and said I had to write a letter. Ignorance can be bliss though
I doubt CA will be an issue but the feds could.
No 1099 means neither state nor federal will know about the money. You're right, the IRS is the ultimate judge and jury, but if there's no 1099, then what evidence do they have?? In the hustle and bustle of my year, a $5,000 rebate check could easily be forgotten at tax time.....unless there was a 1099 to remind me about it.
Are you kidding? Glad you guys aren't representing me in tax court.
:lol:
Bottom line ... when push comes to shove, only THESE peeps can say what is, and what isn't tax law, where WE live:
http://www.ustaxcourt.gov/judges.htm
I haven't had to represent any one for years, but one thing is still the same. It does NOT matter what the IRS says in many cases ... EVEN when a prior IRS written letter says so. The IRS makes TONS of decisions, ie; or "determinations" ... but the IRS are NOT the law.
http://www.taxalmanac.org/index.php/Internal_Revenue_Code:Sec._6110._Public_inspection_of_written_determinations
(3) Precedential status
Unless the Secretary otherwise establishes by regulations, a
written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. The
preceding sentence shall not apply to change the precedential
status (if any) of written determinations with regard to taxes
imposed by subtitle D of this title.
The IRS is just a tax collection agency. The IRS makes private letter rulings all the time. They don't always hold water. Go to tax court, and you won't even be allowed to cite a IRS private letter ruling that favors your stand!
http://www.taxationtimes.com/2010/09-108-2010-09-01/
AmerGen Energy Co., LLC, v. United States, F.3d (Fed. Cl. 2010)
http://www.taxationtimes.com/2010/09-108-2010-09-01/
Few have the money and the cojones to go up against the IRS ... but it happens. And the opposite happens too. Taxpayers rely on private letter rulings from the IRS ... and they go down for it.
On the OTHER hand, if a CARB attorney (or ANY licensed attorney in your state, for that matter) gives you tax advise such as "it's NOT taxable"? And you rely on it? You CAN go after the attorney for the penalties and interest if (s)he's wrong. You STILL have to pay the tax on your own dime. There's CA case law in effect regarding that. But again ... it better be worth your while. So the IRS is NOT your judge and jury. However, if
YOU get a "published Revenue Ruling" from the IRS (that FAVORS your view), those ARE as good as gold, for YOU. Just DON'T think someone else BESIDES you can rely on it. People often do. Most they time they get away with it. Just remember though, it's a gamble.