A Look at Shale Gas and Climate Destabilization

My Nissan Leaf Forum

Help Support My Nissan Leaf Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Everyone must poop..

http://www.endseurope.com/27648?rss=news" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

"French biogas producers will now get between about €0.04 and €0.09 per kilowatt hour from buyers depending on the type and size of their installations and the kind of waste they used, according to new legislation published this week."

and now the Chinese have become warmist also, but not sure if they are Believers.. the Chinese Academy of Sciences is predicting that sea levels will rise 130mm by 2030.

http://english.cas.cn/Ne/CASE/201111/t20111116_78930.shtml" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
 
Report below on groundwater contamination issue.

DENVER — Chemicals used to hydraulically fracture rocks in drilling for natural gas in a remote valley in central Wyoming are the likely cause of contaminated local water supplies, federal regulators said Thursday.
The draft report, after a three-year study by the Environmental Protection Agency, represents a new scientific and political skirmish line over whether fracking, as it is more commonly known, poses a threat in the dozens of places around the nation where it is now being used to extract previously unreachable energy resources locked within rock...

“This investigation proves the importance of having a federal agency that can protect people and the environment,” said John Fenton, the chairman of Pavillion Area Concerned Citizens. “Those of us who suffer the impacts from the unchecked development in our community are extremely happy the contamination source is being identified.”...

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/09/us/epa-says-hydraulic-fracturing-likely-marred-wyoming-water.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
 
Yodrak said:
General observation - the more expensive something is, the more careful people and organizations are going to be with their use, or misuse, of it.

In the case of natural gas, indeed a lot of gas is flared at oil fields where it is a byproduct of the oil production. It's a lot more difficult and expensive to transport the gas than the oil, and simply not worth it. At oil refineries offgas from the refining process may also be flared if it cannot be economically captured, but refineries do capture and productively burn the byproducts of the refining process to generate the heat and electricity required to run the refinery, sometimes with exess to sell.

When natural gas is the product of interest, not a byproduct, the means of production will be limited by what the product can be sold for as compared to the cost of production.

Given the right price for natural gas, oil and gas producers of various methods will become a lot more concerned about how much gas they lose in their operations. As long as the cost of preventing or capturing losses is more than what a producer could get for the gas, there is no incentive other than government regulation to not just let it go.
From a business perspective, I get what you're saying here. I'll assume that the entire post - including the "Given the right price..." portion was written from a business perspective. If so, that suggests that drillers will stop dumping gas only when the price goes up - until then it's not economically viable to collect it.

Except the planet isn't in the boardroom when these decisions are being made. Without a price on carbon, gas prices will continue to fall until shale gas drilling peaks. And that means that business has no incentive to capture this gas.

Back on page one there's a link to a GE paper that talks about global flaring from traditional wells:
http://www.genewscenter.com/Resource-Library/GE-Energy-Flare-Gas-Reduction-Study-e6b.aspx
GE reports that 5% of gas is wasted around the world. That's 5% of gas recovered from traditional (non-forced/fracked) sources - and these are lower pressure/lower flow rate sources. Shale sources have higher pressure and higher flow rates - and 5% loss here (if the industry follows traditional practices above ground) releases a much larger quantity of gas.
 
Herm said:
Everyone must poop..

http://www.endseurope.com/27648?rss=news" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

"French biogas producers will now get between about €0.04 and €0.09 per kilowatt hour from buyers depending on the type and size of their installations and the kind of waste they used, according to new legislation published this week."

and now the Chinese have become warmist also, but not sure if they are Believers.. the Chinese Academy of Sciences is predicting that sea levels will rise 130mm by 2030.

http://english.cas.cn/Ne/CASE/201111/t20111116_78930.shtml" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
It appears that Asian countries have been doing a much better job for a very long time than the West when it comes to compost, methane, and closing the nutrient circle. They've been composting 'forever' but apparently China has been working on biomethane since the 1950s and have been fielding systems since the mid-1970s.

Nature works in circles - loops of 'biologic factory production' that use someone else's output as their input. "Waste" isn't a natural concept. Cultures in the East have continued to close the nutrient loop in natural ways, while our western system is running open-loop. The gaps in our cycle must be supported by petroleum-derived chemical fertilizers on one side, and results in 'waste', sewage, and contaminants on the other side.

Humanure/composting/the nutrient cycle
http://humanurehandbook.com/

Chinese Biogas Manual
http://www.fastonline.org/CD3WD_40/JF/432/24-572.pdf

Cooking with biomass gasification:
http://www.gtz.de/de/dokumente/giz2011-en-micro-gasification.pdf

Biomethane is carbon neutral, while biomass gasification is carbon negative (the 'waste' from the stoves is biochar - carbon - that is returned to the soil to hold nutrients ).

I've been looking for ways to get completely off petroleum. Until a few days ago, I thought the best I could do was eliminate about 70% while using propane to run the kitchen stove and back-up water heater. It's pretty exciting to see that I can provide all my cooking from a combination of solar-derived electricity (microwave, induction burner), a solar oven or biogas from a small digester (directly or via a generator)! All my hot water can come from solar-thermal augmented with either biogas or from 'waste' heat recovered from a small biomass gasifier (or in a mini-combined heat/power process by burning the gas in a generator).

New uses for weather ballons! (Beware, Herm - these folks are chemists and not working from belief. ;))

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xmRWw9LWFw[/youtube]
 
AndyH said:
New uses for weather ballons! (Beware, Herm - these folks are chemists and not working from belief. ;))

I actually respect most scientists, but always keep in mind that they treasure their jobs and will lie, cheat and steal to keep butter on their bread.. some of them.
 
My grandfather used to make biochar 100 years ago, he called it charcoal.. and it was used for cooking (still is), industrial molded charcoal briquettes put him out of business.

This is how charcoal was made, this wood pile would be covered in dirt and the oxygen content was carefully monitored in a slow burn.

800px-Charcoal_pile_05.jpg
 
Herm said:
AndyH said:
New uses for weather ballons! (Beware, Herm - these folks are chemists and not working from belief. ;))
I actually respect most scientists, but always keep in mind that they treasure their jobs and will lie, cheat and steal to keep butter on their bread.. some of them.
I'm thinking we've identified the problem Herm - one of the blondes on Fox News confused 'scientist' and 'politician' on one of the scripts! :lol:

It appears you can blame Henry Ford for trashing your grandfather's business. Early Fords used wood from Kingsford, Michigan and charcoal briquettes were one of the products made from the 'waste.' Apparently, Ford gave people charcoal and grills when they bought a new car - so he created demand for his new product. ;)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingsford,_Michigan
Kingsford was the site of a Ford Motor Company factory which built wooden station station wagon bodies beginning in 1931. During World War 2 Ford built a glider factory which manufactured more than 4,000 wooden frame Waco gliders for the US military. Scrap wood from the Ford factory was used to make charcoal. That charcoal operation was the foundation of the Kingsford Charcoal company.
 
From Bloomberg this morning....maybe making some small progress on the issue of health effects:

Fracking Moratorium Urged as Scientists Call for Health Studies
2012-01-09 16:34:26.175 GMT


By Alex Wayne
Jan. 9 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. should declare a moratorium on hydraulic fracturing for natural gas in populated areas until the health effects are better understood, doctors said at a conference on the drilling process.
Gas producers should set up a foundation to finance studies on fracking and independent research is also needed, said Jerome Paulson, a pediatrician who heads the Mid-Atlantic Center for Children’s Health and the Environment in Washington.
Fracking injects water, sand and chemicals into deep shale formations to free trapped natural gas. A boom in production with the method helped increase supplies, cutting prices 32 percent last year. The industry, though, hasn’t disclosed what chemicals are used, raising concerns about tainted drinking water supplies and a call for peer-reviewed studies on the effects. The EPA is weighing nationwide regulation.
“We’ve got to push the pause button, and maybe we’ve got to push the stop button,” said Adam Law, an endocrinologist at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York, at a conference in Arlington, Virginia that’s the first to examine criteria for studying the process.
A spokesman for America’s Natural Gas Alliance, a trade group based in Washington, didn’t immediately respond to an e- mail seeking comment.
U.S. natural gas production rose to a record 2.5 trillion cubic feet in October, a 15 percent increase from October 2008.
A top scientist at the U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention said last week that fluids used in hydraulic fracturing contain “potentially hazardous chemical classes.”
The compounds include petroleum distillates, volatile organic compounds and glycol ethers, said Christopher Portier, director of the CDC’s National Center for Environmental Health.
A moratorium on fracking pending more research “would be reasonable,” said Paulson, who is also a professor at George Washington University School of Medicine in Washington.
 
http://fracfocus.org/hydraulic-fracturing-process

Website with some detailed info on individual shale fracturing sites around the country.
It seems well presented but really more info than I can digest.

For example :
At a Kern County site, Exxon uses a maximum of 10% 5-chloro-2methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one in their "additive".
Also 289,000 gallons of water are used which "may include fresh water, produced water, and/or recycled water".
I suppose this puts some upper limits on chemical and water use but I wouldn't be surprised if this data is mostly cut and pasted into these forms based on a formula used by the drilling company. So YMMV.
 
Meanwhile the price of NG has collapsed in the US due to a warm winter and fracking

http://www.bentekenergy.com/InTheNews.aspx#Article6144" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
 
Herm said:
Meanwhile the price of NG has collapsed in the US due to a warm winter and fracking

I bet it will go right back up come summer time when California (and everyone else) fires up all of the peaking capacity. Hydro is way down this year due to a drought. I've been watching the CA-ISO site (http://www.caiso.com/green/renewableswatch.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;) over the past few months, and the amount of hydro produced power keeps going down and down...
 
another article:

http://www.bentekenergy.com/InTheNews.aspx#Article6144" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

"US natural gas prices have sunk to the lowest point in a decade as the shale drilling boom threatens to fill the nation’s underground storage network.
Bentek Energy, a market analysis group, last week warned that some swollen storage facilities may soon be forced to let out gas to maintain operational integrity, causing “extreme downward pressure on prices in March.” "

Meanwhile China and Japan are demanding record amounts of NG.
 
Herm said:
another article:

http://www.bentekenergy.com/InTheNews.aspx#Article6144" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

"US natural gas prices have sunk to the lowest point in a decade as the shale drilling boom threatens to fill the nation’s underground storage network.
Bentek Energy, a market analysis group, last week warned that some swollen storage facilities may soon be forced to let out gas to maintain operational integrity, causing “extreme downward pressure on prices in March.” "

Meanwhile China and Japan are demanding record amounts of NG.
If the gas industry wasn't drilling full speed in order to get their wells fracked and producing so they'd be grandfathered into future regulations that are a direct result of damage done by rushed drilling and fracking, then they'd be better positioned to limit production to keep prices - and their profits - higher. ;)
 
The government delivers water after gas company stops...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/19/dimock-pennsylvania-epa-_n_1217422.html?ref=green
http://stateimpact.npr.org/pennsylvania/2012/01/19/epa-to-send-water-to-dimock-households/

The U.S. Envi­ron­men­tal Pro­tec­tion Agency will send clean water to res­i­dents of the Susque­hanna County com­mu­nity where nat­ural gas drilling has con­t­a­m­i­nated water sup­plies. About a dozen fam­i­lies in Dimock, Pa. have a law­suit pend­ing against Cabot Oil and Gas. The EPA says four of those fam­i­lies will receive fresh water deliv­er­ies. Three years ago, res­i­dents began to notice changes to their water, and were able to set their taps on fire. State reg­u­la­tors blamed Cabot for faulty well con­struc­tion and ordered the com­pany to sup­ply clean water. But in Novem­ber, 2011 the state Depart­ment of Envi­ron­men­tal Pro­tec­tion gave Cabot the green light to halt water shipments.
I wonder if We the People can make a claim against Cabot's insurance?
 
A bit off topic, but check out the agenda for the S Texas Eagle Ford Shale conference. Ignore that fact that we're in a severe drought and this gas play is hydraulically fractured...

http://eaglefordconsortium.org/?p=599

February 29, 2012 * 9am-5pm

Pre-Conference
Housing Challenges

March 1, 2012 * 7:30am-7pm

Exhibits, Networking & Continental Breakfast

Keynote Address
The Eagle Ford Shale: Industry & Communities
A WIN-WIN for South Texas

Local Opportunities & Challenges Panel
East of the Play and West of the Play

Breakout Sessions

Track 1 Education & Workforce
Stepping Up: Preparing the Current & Future Workforce
Track 2 Economic Development
Public & Private Partnerships
Track 3 Preserve, Protect & Enhance the Community’s Infrastructure
Air, Water, Transportation, Communications & Public Safety

Keynote Address
Preparing the Workforce to Become a Global Leader

Eagle Ford Shale Development
Application of Modern Hydraulic Fracturing
Eagle Ford Shale – Water Usage

Oil & Gas Industry Panel
Updates from Major Companies to Include Question & Answer

Round Table Discussions

Education & Workforce: The Issues
What’s at Stake & Where Do We Go From Here? Setting Plans in Motion
Economic Development
How to Maximize the Impact & Doing Business with the Industry
Infrastructure
Building on What You Have & Being Sustainable

Reception Honoring our Regional Legislators



March 2 * 8am-2pm

Exhibits, Networking & Continental Breakfast

Keynote Address
Texas & Oil: Responsiveness to Community, Workforce & Economic Development

UTSA Economic Impact Update

Regulatory Overview: A View to the Future

Legislative Panel: Moving Communities Forward

Keynote Address
Creating a Regional Sustainable Pathway
 
Second NY State judge upholds fracking ban...

ALBANY, N.Y., Feb 24 (Reuters) - A New York state judge on Friday upheld an upstate community's ban on gas drilling, marking the second victory this week for opponents of the drilling method known as fracking.
Cerio's ruling was similar to a decision released on Tuesday that dismissed a bid by gas company Anschutz Exploration Corp to overturn a drilling ban in the Ithaca, New York, suburb of Dryden.

In that decision, Supreme Court Justice Phillip Rumsey held state law was crafted to regulate industry in such a way that "protects the rights of all persons."

The rulings come as the state Department of Environmental Conservation prepares a final report on the safety of fracking, which is currently not allowed in New York. Governor Andrew Cuomo is expected to make a final decision on the issue later this year.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/25/new-york-fracking-ban_n_1300600.html?ref=green
 
http://grist.org/climate-change/cli...ransition-with-no-natural-gas-myhrvold-finds/

The consequences of this time lag are twofold. First, substantially affecting global temperature in the first half of the century is all but impossible; even to secure temperature reductions in the second half of the century, a rapid transition to clean energy needs to begin immediately. Second, lower-carbon energy — like, say, natural gas — just won’t do it. If we transitioned to something with half of coal’s emissions, it would take more than a century to produce even a 25 percent decline in CO2 relative to the status quo baseline. By then we’d be cooked.
 
http://www.rollingstone.com/politic...-color-will-the-sky-be-over-new-york-20120620
Anyway, the guy you really gotta come to terms with is Josh Fox. Because this little film about the troubles with fracking in New York is pretty damn good. Among other things, he’s got some damning info from the industry on well failures that you might want to have a look at. Whatever you think of the film, one thing is for sure: It’s gonna be seen by a lot of people – a lot of voters, governor. So as you ponder how and when to lift the ban on fracking in New York, give it a look. Journalists like myself will be interested to hear your response to the question Josh addresses to you at the end of the film: "Governor Cuomo, what color will the sky be over New York?"

Watch the video.
http://vimeo.com/44367635

Industry documents - why and how wells leak:
http://www1.rollingstone.com/extras/theskyispink_annotdoc-gasl4final.pdf
 
http://www.gaslandthemovie.com/blog/?p=133

Outrage, But No Surprise At DEP Corruption Charge


Fellow citizens of Pennsylvania, we have a serious problem. The suspicion that PA DEP is colluding with the gas industry, a belief long held by many living in the Marcellus Shale, has just been supported by the sworn testimony of two whistleblowers. Two employees from within the PA DEP, Taru Upadhyay and John Carson, have given depositions describing outrageous breaches of trust by the PA DEP, alleging they deliberately failed to report the presence of metals, which are known hydrofracking-related contaminants, in water wells it tested in the Marcellus Shale:

Aluminum
Copper
Silicon
Lithium
Molybdenum
Zinc
Nickel
Cobalt
Titanium
Boron

In addition, the following volatile organic compounds commonly found in the Fracking process were also found in the wells and not reported:

Acteone
Chloroform
T-butyl alcohol

Don Hopey has been reporting in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette that the DEP has systematically been producing incomplete lab reports on water wells affected by hydraulic fracturing and has been using those tainted reports to refute the claims of those Pennsylvanians whose water has been affected by drilling operations.

These are VERY serious allegations. People in PA usually only request water testing by the DEP because they suspect their water has been contaminated. PA Rep. Jesse White is rightly calling for a State and Federal investigation. If the PA DEP has been deliberately altering or obstructing test data and telling people their water was safe, then, as Rep. White says "anyone who relied on the DEP for the truth about whether their water has been impacted by drilling activities has apparently been intentionally deprived of critical health and safety information by their own government".

Many throughout PA have waited months for DEP water test results, only to find out that they were mysteriously hung-up in Harrisburg. many have experienced disceprancies between the costly independent water tests they ordered from private labs and "official" test results from the DEP. As a result, many have long suspected misconduct or some form of obstruction at work within the DEP. I'm one of them. But this week's revelations are jaw-dropping for even the most jaded conspiracy theorist. They leave me shocked and outraged.

This egregious behaviour represents a naked example of putting corporate profits ahead of public health and safety, even at the cost of poisoning our water and our faith in government.

What a sad contrast with what we've seen in the last week as federal, state and municipal governments mobilized an unprecedented and moving response to Hurricane Sandy. All across the eastern seaboard we are mourning the lives taken by this storm and sending our thoughts to those whose loved ones have been lost. While we reel from its effects, we're also aggrieved that these extreme weather events, which grow in intensity and destructiveness every year, are only beginning to be acknowledged as effects of climate change. Fracking and other extreme techniques for extracting and increasing our reliance on fossil fuels only stand to make it worse.

Pennsylvania's citizens have had enough of being exploited by big oil and gas. They deserve an immediate and thorough investigation into this brazen, and what seems to be illegal conduct of Krancer and Corbett's DEP. If the whistleblower's allegations and the Post-Gazette's reporting turn out to be true, we should call for the impeachment and/or recall of the Corbett administration.
http://www.gaslandthemovie.com/blog/?p=133
 
Back
Top