$30,000 Electric Chevy Equinox

My Nissan Leaf Forum

Help Support My Nissan Leaf Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Bouldergramp

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 15, 2018
Messages
190
Location
COLORADO
"GM Courts Mainstream Buyers with $30,000 Electric Chevy Equinox
The SUV, slated to arrive in fall 2023, would be among the least-expensive electric vehicles in the U.S."
 
Bouldergramp said:
"GM Courts Mainstream Buyers with $30,000 Electric Chevy Equinox
The SUV, slated to arrive in fall 2023, would be among the least-expensive electric vehicles in the U.S."

I guess we will see when it gets here.
 
DaveinOlyWA said:
Bouldergramp said:
"GM Courts Mainstream Buyers with $30,000 Electric Chevy Equinox
The SUV, slated to arrive in fall 2023, would be among the least-expensive electric vehicles in the U.S."

I guess we will see when it gets here.
+1
I saw the ad last night during the opening football game and paused and read all the fine print, which there were quite a bit. And while they touted fall 2023 they also mentioned spring 2024 and I'll believe it when I see it. A 300-mile electric(what the ad was "guessing" as it hasn't been rated by the EPA yet) for $30k! I told the wife it will probably have more like a 260-mile range and cost around $40k, heck in 2 years when it may come out it will probably cost more.
Exciting ad for sure though :lol:
 
jjeff said:
DaveinOlyWA said:
Bouldergramp said:
"GM Courts Mainstream Buyers with $30,000 Electric Chevy Equinox
The SUV, slated to arrive in fall 2023, would be among the least-expensive electric vehicles in the U.S."

I guess we will see when it gets here.
+1
I saw the ad last night during the opening football game and paused and read all the fine print, which there were quite a bit. And while they touted fall 2023 they also mentioned spring 2024 and I'll believe it when I see it. A 300-mile electric(what the ad was "guessing" as it hasn't been rated by the EPA yet) for $30k! I told the wife it will probably have more like a 260-mile range and cost around $40k, heck in 2 years when it may come out it will probably cost more.
Exciting ad for sure though :lol:

No doubt the price is after incentives so could be $42,000 in some states...which makes it about the same as everyone else...
 
DaveinOlyWA said:
jjeff said:
DaveinOlyWA said:
I guess we will see when it gets here.
+1
I saw the ad last night during the opening football game and paused and read all the fine print, which there were quite a bit. And while they touted fall 2023 they also mentioned spring 2024 and I'll believe it when I see it. A 300-mile electric(what the ad was "guessing" as it hasn't been rated by the EPA yet) for $30k! I told the wife it will probably have more like a 260-mile range and cost around $40k, heck in 2 years when it may come out it will probably cost more.
Exciting ad for sure though :lol:

No doubt the price is after incentives so could be $42,000 in some states...which makes it about the same as everyone else...
If you read the very fine print, you'll find that the $30K price is after all rebates. Also, that price is for the two wheel drive version with a smaller battery which is good for 263 mi of range. So a $40K MSRP is likely for a stripped down version and $50K-$55K for a full boat with the improved range. Not much different than any other new EV announcements. No big cost reduction, just the usual marketing hype.
 
johnlocke said:
DaveinOlyWA said:
jjeff said:
+1
I saw the ad last night during the opening football game and paused and read all the fine print, which there were quite a bit. And while they touted fall 2023 they also mentioned spring 2024 and I'll believe it when I see it. A 300-mile electric(what the ad was "guessing" as it hasn't been rated by the EPA yet) for $30k! I told the wife it will probably have more like a 260-mile range and cost around $40k, heck in 2 years when it may come out it will probably cost more.
Exciting ad for sure though :lol:

No doubt the price is after incentives so could be $42,000 in some states...which makes it about the same as everyone else...
If you read the very fine print, you'll find that the $30K price is after all rebates. Also, that price is for the two wheel drive version with a smaller battery which is good for 263 mi of range. So a $40K MSRP is likely for a stripped down version and $50K-$55K for a full boat with the improved range. Not much different than any other new EV announcements. No big cost reduction, just the usual marketing hype.
You are absolutely correct, I did some reading mostly at InsideEVs mostly in the comment section and as stated, NOT the 300-mile version for $30k which I think is kind of deceptive advertising and again only 2WD which some might be able to forgo but not in the snow belt where I live. Well actually I've been getting by without it for years but it's one of the big reasons I'm wanting to finally get an SUV, that and a higher seating position.
Link to the InsiveEVs article and again the comment section seemed to have the most useful information and quite a few people seemed to have an issue with it's 150Kw charging speed but L2 goes all the way up to 19kw on the top top model and even base is 11kw I believe, which is nice and for me more useful than a super fast L3 but I suppose for road tripping would be nice.
https://insideevs.com/news/609079/2024-chevrolet-equinox-ev-revealed-detailed/
 
Flyct said:
With the extra charging capabilities it's likely that a 80a or 100 a, service would be required at home vs the current 50 amp plugs that are standard for the current Leaf.
Yes with the common RV 14-50 outlet the max you could charge would be around 9600w (50a breaker derated to 80%) or 11,520w running your 14-50 outlet with a 60a breaker and again derated to 80% which I believe would be OK if you used 6a wiring as a 14-50 outlet itself I believe is rated for 50a continuous, it's just the breaker that is not, a 60a breaker derated to 80% would be 48a.
If you used the highest amperage standard 240v outlet you could(14-60) you could probably tweak out 14,400w using a 75a breaker if they sell such a thing and again at 80% derating which would draw an exact 60a.
Of course, if you hardwired your EVSE and had one with a massive J1772 cable you could go even higher but to achieve the 19kw some of the Equinoxs are supposed to go up to one would need a massive 80a continuous circuit or 100a breaker :eek: and some very impressive J1772 cable!
Truthfully at such wattages, I think Tesla had it right, instead of one massive circuit and cabling why not just use 2 separate plugs and EVSEs.....that makes more sense to me anyway. Two 14-60 plugs and EVSEs would give you the same 19kw :idea: If you had 2 free standard 30a public EVSEs you could charge at 14,400kw, heck about as fast as my '12 charges on L3 with it's degraded battery.
 
jjeff said:
14-50 outlet itself I believe is rated for 50a continuous
I think that outlet is only rated up to 40A continuous. For a 48A EVSE, you'll have to hardwire it or get a __-60 outlet.
 
jjeff said:
Truthfully at such wattages, I think Tesla had it right, instead of one massive circuit and cabling why not just use 2 separate plugs and EVSEs.....
Or go three phase, there is already a standard for that (type 2, already used by EVs nearly everywhere in the world outside North America and China). There are even 43 kW EVSEs available off the shelf; there is one a few miles from my home. But the cable gets pretty heavy for that; 22 kW 3-phase is more reasonable. Two whole EVSEs and cables is pretty impractical, it seems to me.

I know that 3-phase isn't all that common in the US, but surely when you get to that power level, it's available.
 
coulomb said:
jjeff said:
Truthfully at such wattages, I think Tesla had it right, instead of one massive circuit and cabling why not just use 2 separate plugs and EVSEs.....
Or go three phase, there is already a standard for that (type 2, already used by EVs nearly everywhere in the world outside North America and China). There are even 43 kW EVSEs available off the shelf; there is one a few miles from my home. But the cable gets pretty heavy for that; 22 kW 3-phase is more reasonable. Two whole EVSEs and cables is pretty impractical, it seems to me.

I know that 3-phase isn't all that common in the US, but surely when you get to that power level, it's available.
Three phase for residential use is highly unusual. Your utility may not even offer it for residential use. I know because I tried. SDG&E wouldn't allow me to do it even though the three phase lines are directly overhead on a distribution pole in my backyard. I had wanted the extra power for a workshop. Anyway 19KW charging is an answer in search of a question. Tesla had a similar option a few years age but nobody bought it and they discontinued it. If 11KW isn't enough , then you need a DCFC anyway. Five hours to charge vs 9 hours isn't a deal breaker. either way it's overnight or a full work day charging. It might make sense in Europe where three phase 220VAC is a common wiring option but that's still more of a convivence than a requirement. Oh yeah, go price a 3 phase breaker box. You'll have to check commercial/industrial sources and they aren't cheap.
 
johnlocke said:
SDG&E wouldn't allow me to do it even though the three phase lines are directly overhead on a distribution pole in my backyard.
Those would likely be 7200V (phase to phase) distribution lines, not low voltage (120/240V). I was going to post that this seems unreasonable, until I remembered that your existing transformer has the centre tap grounded (for split phase). That makes it impossible to just add two single phase transformers (presumably good value because they're produced in very high volume) for the other two phases; instead you'd have to add a single three-phase transformer with the centre of the secondary's Y point grounded to get 3 x 240V with respect to neutral/ground. You can't use the thee-phase transformer to replace the old one either, unless it had an extra tap and a half extended winding (6 LV outputs, see phase diagram below; that's not a standard transformer my any means).

It would be easier to add two 120V single phase transformers to make 208V 3-phase (208 phase to phase, 120V phase to neutral). But that defeats the purpose of making increased power available. 32A at such voltages is still only 11kW. I suppose you could add two 208V single phase transformers to make 360V phase to phase and 208 phase to neutral. 208V x 32A x 3 would be 20kW, hardly any increase over 19.2kW,

Well, it's comforting for me to realise that the three-phase aversion in North America actually has some technical basis.


ajgJWMf.png
 
coulomb said:
I was going to post that this seems unreasonable, until I remembered that your existing transformer has the centre tap grounded (for split phase). That makes it impossible to just add two single phase transformers (presumably good value because they're produced in very high volume) for the other two phases; instead you'd have to add a single three-phase transformer with the centre of the secondary's Y point grounded to get 3 x 240V with respect to neutral/ground.
A few comments (just on electrical services, haven't been following why 3 phase services came up):

- I think 3 phase wye services can be formed with 3 separate single phase pole mount transformers. I expect ground mounts would be a single 3 phase transformer.

- If the POCO supports it (it may not), one or two single phase transformers can be added to a 120/240V single phase service to form an open or closed 3 phase hi leg 240V delta. That won't let you balance 120V loads across all 3 phases, but you could balance 240V loads, or power 240V 3 phase delta loads. Although such a service is not typically balanced, as the transformers may have different ratings.

- I think that often the same pole mount transformer can be used for 120/240V single phase service, or one leg of a 208Y/120V service.

Cheers, Wayne
 
Wayne is correct, 3 single-phase pole-mount transformers could be connected to give 208Y/120-volt service. There are a few older sections of Phoenix that have 3-phase residential service, but nothing is presently available for new residential customers. It is actually possible to get 3-phase service from two single-phase transformers, but I am not going to try to explain those connections. Someone mentioned using a 60A breaker with a 14-50 receptacle for 48A continuous--not allowed. You can use either a 40A or 50A breaker with a 14-50 receptacle with appropriate conductor sizes. Therefore, the maximum charge rate would be 9.6 kW at 240V with 50A breaker and 14-50 receptacle.
 
wwhitney said:
haven't been following why 3 phase services came up):
Merely for higher AC charging power. A fairly rare need.

- I think 3 phase wye services can be formed with 3 separate single phase pole mount transformers.
Yes. But then one end of each secondary is connected to neutral/ground, which means you can't supply both 120V and 240V outlets in the usual way. I suppose you could put all the 120V outlets on one winding, and have the 240V outlet connect neutral to one end. That would work, except for outlets with 4 terminals, otherwise the one labelled neutral would actually be 120V above earth, and that would presumably be a safety risk (I'm unclear on that point; live chassis radios are now rather rare). It might overload that one winding, though it could be wound with thicker copper than the other windings to compensate. One phase would take all the outlet loads plus 1/3 of the EV load, but most residences are single phase anyway, so that's no different.

- If the POCO supports it (it may not), one or two single phase transformers can be added to a 120/240V single phase service to form an open or closed 3 phase hi leg 240V delta. That won't let you balance 120V loads across all 3 phases, but you could balance 240V loads, or power 240V 3 phase delta loads.
Yes, though again the 240V loads would have non-standard potentials with respect to ground. Some would have higher than 120V from "neutral" to ground, I think. [ Edit: sigh, No. They would all be 120V with respect to ground. ]

- I think that often the same pole mount transformer can be used for 120/240V single phase service, or one leg of a 208Y/120V service.
That seems the same as your first point, assuming that there are GPOs at the site. Even specialised sites like EV charging stations would I think have at least a few GPOs for convenience, cleaning, maintenance, etc. So the same comments re non-standard potentials with respect to ground apply.

Sorry for prolonging the off-topic chat; I don't often get to think about North American power systems and their different arrangements.

GerryAZ said:
Wayne is correct, 3 single-phase pole-mount transformers could be connected to give 208Y/120-volt service.
Edit: I had confused 208Y with high leg delta. Sigh.

So this would be essentially 3 120V circuits (albeit with vastly reduced neutral conductor current), which still only gives some 11kW for 32A.
 
coulomb said:
Yes. But then one end of each secondary is connected to neutral/ground, which means you can't supply both 120V and 240V outlets in the usual way.
On a 208Y/120V system you can supply the 120V loads from any of the 3 phases L-N, and you can't get 240V at all. You can get 208V L-L, and many 240V loads will work at 208V and are so labeled. 240V loads that are primarily resistive (e.g. electric oven) will only get 75% power when run at 208V. Some apartment buildings are supplied with 208Y/120V and then supply each apartment with a 3-wire 120/208V system, consisting of the neutral and 2 of the 3 phase conductors. A 208V EVSE at a given current level provides sqrt(3)/2 = 86.6% of the power that a 240V EVSE would provide.

coulomb said:
Yes, though again the 240V loads would have non-standard potentials with respect to ground. Some would have higher than 120V from "neutral" to ground, I think. [ Edit: sigh, No. They would all be 120V with respect to ground. ]
On a 4-wire high leg 240V delta system, the L-N voltages are 120V, 120V, and 208V. Loads are not supply L-N on the 208V "high leg", it is only used for 3-wire 240V delta loads.

coulomb said:
That seems the same as your first point
Not quite--my first point was that for pole mounted transformers, 3 single phase transformers would typically be used; and my last point was that if a 120/240V single phase service was being changed to 208Y/120V, I think the existing transformer could be reconfigured, with just 2 new transformers brought in, rather than needing 3 new ones. Not 100% sure on that.

Anyway, not so relevant to EV charging, they work fine on single phase 2-wire circuits. Although if the car's charger supports a 3-phase input (presumably not via J1772), then a 3 phase DC rectifier might have some minor advantages, not sure.

Cheers, Wayne
 
Back
Top