You must have +12v to pins 7 & 12 of the BMS.nikmaster wrote:You did great job with this research, Turbo3
I've been trying also yesterday to connect the OBD/Bluetooth (same as yours) to the BMS, but without any batteries - it does not make any connection to the BMS.
Powered all 3 lines - connected together to +12V. The processor has power and some CAN info on the oscilloscope at pin 1 and pin 13.
But no connection on the Leaf Spy Pro. Tested with 3 different BMS - same result.
Is there any specific settings on the Leaf Spy to connect directly to the BMS, not looking for the other car computers?
It does not read even the temperatures either, act like no connection. Each CAN side has 120ohm resistor.
The android with the same OBD/Bluetooth on a car works.
I have few pieces of these BMS 2012,2013 models left, can provide if somebody interested to do experiments.
Thanks
Thanks. Works. The problems was the "BMS" option - I did not mention it.Turbo3 wrote: You must have +12v to pins 7 & 12 of the BMS.
When you wire up the OBDII socket you must wire the EV-CAN from the BMS to Car-CAN of the OBDII Socket.
BMS pin 1 CAN-H to OBDII socket pin 6
BMS pin13 CAN-L to OBDII socket pin14
Power and Ground to OBDII socket too
On LeafSpy Pro you must select BMS as the model year in settings (selection before 2011).
Anything less than the original 96 cells will require rewiring of the BMS board and some care to not burn out the ICs.nikmaster wrote:Thanks. Works. The problems was the "BMS" option - I did not mention it.Turbo3 wrote: You must have +12v to pins 7 & 12 of the BMS.
When you wire up the OBDII socket you must wire the EV-CAN from the BMS to Car-CAN of the OBDII Socket.
BMS pin 1 CAN-H to OBDII socket pin 6
BMS pin13 CAN-L to OBDII socket pin14
Power and Ground to OBDII socket too
On LeafSpy Pro you must select BMS as the model year in settings (selection before 2011).
Will test it with the current sensor and pack of 16 cells to see how is doing. Also will test it in charging if that BMS will try to do balancing. Probably not, but for monitoring system still can be used.
I will post the results here.
I'm willing to rewire from the PC2 diode to PC4, so this way will cut the second 48 cells.Turbo3 wrote: Anything less than the original 96 cells will require rewiring of the BMS board and some care to not burn out the ICs.
I have been wondering what micro-controller they use. I noticed that on anothernikmaster wrote:
I have few pieces of these BMS 2012,2013 models left, can provide if somebody interested to do experiments.
Thanks
On the controller says:cliff wrote:I have been wondering what micro-controller they use. I noticed that on anothernikmaster wrote:
I have few pieces of these BMS 2012,2013 models left, can provide if somebody interested to do experiments.
Thanks
micro-controller that I was using, that the documentation indicated that even
though the flag is set that that says you can not read the code, that the code
could still be read using the JTAG interface. I would be curious to see if that
holds true for the BMS micro-controller.
Thanks for the info. From the documentation this controller is more protected.nikmaster wrote:
On the controller says:
70F3236
Here is the link to the PDF:
http://pdf.datasheetarchive.com/indexer ... 511174.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;