I think the correct thing to say would be that the ROI is low - just like a lot of investment in defence technology we do ;-)AndyH said:And some say we didn't get any return from our space investments.
What's the saying - they're welcome to their opinions but not their 'facts'? :lol:evnow said:I think the correct thing to say would be that the ROI is low - just like a lot of investment in defence technology we do ;-)AndyH said:And some say we didn't get any return from our space investments.
I was finally able to take a look outside and saw the Earth for the first time… Tears started rolling down my face. I could not catch my breath… Even thinking about it now still brings tears to my eyes. Here it was this beautiful planet turning graciously about itself, under the warm rays of the Sun… so peaceful…so full of life… no signs of war, no signs of borders, no signs of trouble, just pure beauty…
How I wished everyone could experience this feeling in their heart, specially those who are at the head of the governments in the world. may be this experience would give them a new perspective and help bring peace to the world.
AndyH said:[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtkZtACxcac[/youtube]
http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/videogallery/index.html
This says it all, I think. crap - more kleenex.
Amen.Jimmydreams said:Why did that strike me as more of a memorial video than a forward looking one?
I fear we're selling future generations short for today's greed and satisfaction.
Jimmydreams said:I fear we're selling future generations short for today's greed and satisfaction.
And this:The Dragon spacecraft was developed from a blank sheet to the first demonstration flight in just over four years for about $300 million. Last year, SpaceX became the first private company, in partnership with NASA, to successfully orbit and recover a spacecraft. The spacecraft and the Falcon 9 rocket that carried it were designed, manufactured and launched by American workers for an American company. The Falcon 9/Dragon system, with the addition of a launch escape system, seats and upgraded life support, can carry seven astronauts to orbit, more than double the capacity of the Russian Soyuz, but at less than a third of the price per seat.
This is a pretty cool bit as well:As noted last month by a Chinese government official, SpaceX currently has the best launch prices in the world and they don’t believe they can beat them. This is a clear case of American innovation trumping lower overseas labor rates.
http://blog.nss.org/?p=2566The average price of a full-up NASA Dragon cargo mission to the International Space Station is $133 million including inflation, or roughly $115m in today’s dollars, and we have a firm, fixed price contract with NASA for 12 missions. This price includes the costs of the Falcon 9 launch, the Dragon spacecraft, all operations, maintenance and overhead, and all of the work required to integrate with the Space Station. If there are cost overruns, SpaceX will cover the difference. (This concept may be foreign to some traditional government space contractors that seem to believe that cost overruns should be the responsibility of the taxpayer.)
AndyH said:You guys are real optimists! I'm thinking you should get your eyes checked if you see any fat ladies singing about the end of US spaceflight. :lol:
Ok, maybe this is where my Pollyanna meets your dread.earther said:AndyH said:You guys are real optimists! I'm thinking you should get your eyes checked if you see any fat ladies singing about the end of US spaceflight. :lol:
well, bear in mind those are all quotes from Elon Musk, the CEO of SpaceX, so it's not unexpected that they're spun in favor of space privatization. Nevertheless, I truly wish them all the luck in the world, since they're now the new hope for any american space advancement.
AndyH said:...
SpaceX and a couple of other companies are focusing first on picking up the 'bus service' from Earth to the ISS and possibly expanding from there. I haven't yet seen anything that suggests they have aims beyond Earth orbit, though.
It kinda depends. If you do it the RIGHT way, you use your orbital delivery capability to boost the modules, supplies and people into orbit. Assemble your Moon or Mars vehicle in space, then head out from there. If you start from orbit, leaving earth's gravity isn't hard at all.TEG said:Space-X has repeatedly indicated plans to eventually create a manned Mars colony!
I recall hearing that breaking free from Earth's gravity takes way more thrust/power than reaching orbit (to supply the ISS for instance), so I think they need to prove another generation of rockets before they can think about going to the moon or even another planet.
davewill said:...If you do it the RIGHT way, you use your orbital delivery capability to boost the modules, supplies and people into orbit. Assemble your Moon or Mars vehicle in space, then head out from there. If you start from orbit, leaving earth's gravity isn't hard at all...
I sit corrected! :lol: Very cool! I hope NASA can break free from the political roller-coaster in this country, and I hope the private efforts also stay clear of politics. We've got some long-haul ship building to catch-up on!TEG said:AndyH said:...
SpaceX and a couple of other companies are focusing first on picking up the 'bus service' from Earth to the ISS and possibly expanding from there. I haven't yet seen anything that suggests they have aims beyond Earth orbit, though.
Space-X has repeatedly indicated plans to eventually create a manned Mars colony!
Enter your email address to join: