GRA
Posts: 10454
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:49 pm
Location: East side of San Francisco Bay

GCC: California targets buildings for GHG reduction

Thu Feb 21, 2019 6:04 pm

https://www.greencarcongress.com/2019/02/20190221-cec.html

Calling for the next frontier of energy planning and policy, the California Energy Commission approved the 2018 Integrated Energy Policy Report. The report highlights California’s past successes but focuses attention on how a state with nearly 40 million people will significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

In 2018, renewable energy provided about 34 percent of the electricity used to serve the state. While significant progress has been made, there is more work to be done, especially in light of California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment. It found Californians must prepare for a future punctuated by severe wildfires, rising sea levels and extreme weather.

The policy report highlights the need to decarbonize buildings and double energy efficiency savings.

    In California, building GHG emissions are second only to transportation, when accounting for electricity use, water use, and wastewater treatment. The focus over the past decade has been on advancing zero-net-energy buildings, and this must pivot to zero-emission buildings as the state mobilizes to meet its 2030 and 2050 climate goals. This change from zero-net energy to zero-emission buildings focuses squarely on reducing GHG emissions from the entire building, including from the use of electricity, natural gas, other fuels, as well as cooling systems that typically use highly potent GHGs.

    —2018 Integrated Energy Policy Report

The Energy Commission also approved key investments to encourage emerging technologies to help food processing plants work toward a low-carbon future. More than a dozen projects received grant funds in Central Valley towns, such as Kingsburg, Woodland, Livingston and Tulare. The projects will reduce energy use and greenhouse gas emissions associated with food production.

Link to report here: https://www.energy.ca.gov/2018_energypolicy/documents/
Guy [I have lots of experience designing/selling off-grid AE systems, some using EVs but don't own one. Local trips are by foot, bike and/or rapid transit].

The 'best' is the enemy of 'good enough'. Copper shot, not Silver bullets.

Oilpan4
Gold Member
Posts: 562
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2019 10:51 pm
Delivery Date: 10 May 2018
Leaf Number: 004270

Re: GCC: California targets buildings for GHG reduction

Thu Feb 21, 2019 11:12 pm

It seems they realize the scale of the problem now.

That's basic power generation.
It's usually always cheaper to save a watt than build a watt worth of generating capacity.
Or if you need heating it's usually cheaper to combust a watt worth of heat rather than power it.

People are often skeptical about the power company wanting to help them save energy. I'm not. The more people they can power up before they need to build another power plant the more money they make.

The easiest thing a food plant can do to save a watt is put most of the pumps and conveyers on frequency drives.
For example the 200hp pumps that feed water to the place where I work are on drives. One motor runs 24 hours a day 7 days a week, the second one kicks on a few times a day for maybe an hour or 3. Just this one motor and drive saves at least several hundred kwh every single day compared to running it full speed and regulating pressure with a valve like they did back in the old days.

I read a DoE report few months ago that said only 4% of industrial motors are on drives.

Ha, where I work about 80% of the motors are on drives. Power bill still comes in around $30,000 per day, I hate to think what it would be with out all those super high efficiency instrument controlled motors on drives.
2011 white SL leaf with 2014 batt.
Chargers: Panasonic brick moded for 240v, duosida 16a 240v and a 10kw setec portable CHAdeMO
Location: 88103

GRA
Posts: 10454
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:49 pm
Location: East side of San Francisco Bay

Re: GCC: California targets buildings for GHG reduction

Fri Feb 22, 2019 5:24 pm

Oilpan4 wrote:It seems they realize the scale of the problem now. <snip>

Actually, California has been dealing with the scale of the problem for forty years, as we were the first state to have building energy efficiency standards (Title 24, 1978), back during Jerry Brown's first go-around as Governor (1975-1983): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Energy_Code.

We also implemented appliance energy efficiency standards (Title 20, 1976): https://www.energy.ca.gov/title20/ which ultimately influenced the Federal Government to begin the Energy Star program. Both standards are regularly updated.
Guy [I have lots of experience designing/selling off-grid AE systems, some using EVs but don't own one. Local trips are by foot, bike and/or rapid transit].

The 'best' is the enemy of 'good enough'. Copper shot, not Silver bullets.

Return to “Off-Topic”