SDG&E "Experimental Rates" TOU Plans

My Nissan Leaf Forum

Help Support My Nissan Leaf Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Jimmydreams

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 23, 2010
Messages
1,500
Location
Oceanside, Ca.
Ok...I have officially been notified by SDG&E that I have randomly been placed in EVPM-M rate plan. The rates are:

TOU-Mrates.png


these rates are valid during the following times:
toumtimes.png


I do not know where this TOU-M plan falls into the '3 experimental rate plans", so if you have a different plan, please post your numbers here so we can compare what SDG&E is attempting to do.
 
It is one of the three rates...they just renamed them. Although I do not think they intend to use the one with highest rates. However it is still in their rate submission packages to the PUC,

I was assigned the same rate schedule as you.

Glen
 
See this thread: http://www.mynissanleaf.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=2017

They dropped the low-ratio rate, leaving the medium and high ratio rates--which offer better value for those who charge late at night. I think that's the lower-priced (e.g., higher ratio) of the two.

Woot!

EDIT:

Er, ah, the "M" in your rate name would indicate "medium". So that's the higher priced of the two that are left, assuming they did drop the much-hated "L" ratio plan. Still, that "M" is a good deal!
 
There were three rates:
EVPM-L
EVPM-M
EVPM-H

The low/med/high refers to the Ratio or spread between peak and off-peak. For someone who charges only on super-off-peak, you want the HIGHEST ratio and greatest discount.

The one being discarded is the EVPM-L plan, which had very little spread between super-off-peak, and represented the worst discount for night charging. I haven't heard confirmation if they really did it, so if anyone ends up on EVPM-L, please do post.

Both -M and -H are cheaper at super-off-peak than baseline DR rates -- Win!
 
And I though the LADWP rates and structure were obtuse!

Jimmydreams said:
Ok...I have officially been notified by SDG&E that I have randomly been placed in EVPM-M rate plan.

I do not know where this TOU-M plan falls into the '3 experimental rate plans", so if you have a different plan, please post your numbers here so we can compare what SDG&E is attempting to do.
 
Congrats bodengroden! Cheapest midnight charging: $0.06723 & $0.07043
EPEV-M is only a penny more: $0.07646 & 0.08220, and if you have to charge mid-day, at least it won't scream.

I'd take either one. The EPEV-L is the stinker.
 
Yes pretty cool. I do feel that we are being herded to charge from 12 to 5am...but with the timer set up it shouldn't be that hard to comply...

I wonder what impact this car will have on my overall utility bill at this rate structure if I only charge super off peak. If I average 50 miles a day (12 kW) is it simply 12 x the rate $0.07 x 30 days = ~$25.2 a month?
 
Back in December we opted out of the SD rate study because SDGE wanted to add a second meter to our system for the car. We have an excess of solar power since we designed the system for two electric cars. SDGE wanted us to pay for charging the car even though we were producing plenty of power from our PV system. We reviewed all the rate schedules before we made the decision and back then there was only two different classes, M and H, the low rate structure not currently being offered. (Though in reality the L,M,H names I found highly misleading once you study the rates. They are posted somewhere on SDGE's site. They are buried pretty deep otherwise I'd link to them)

We'll see how the rest of the EV Project goes now that the car has been delivered!

-U
 
So, you figure that, with "enough" PV over-production, considering the added cost of installing the extra meter, and the (possibly?) extra monthly meter fee, that just staying on the standard whole-house, non-TOU (-D?) rate is best?
 
garygid said:
So, you figure that, with "enough" PV over-production, considering the added cost of installing the extra meter, and the (possibly?) extra monthly meter fee, that just staying on the standard whole-house, non-TOU (-D?) rate is best?

For me either of the experimental EV rates are best, which is good since I'm accepted for the EV project. Otherwise I'd just stay on the DR schedule because the EV-TOU rate isn't worth it with all the uncertainty on costs, and the EV-TOU2 rate is worse. http://www.mynissanleaf.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=2017&start=20 I could send you my spreadsheet if you wanted to alter it to put in your own assumptions of usage and PV production, and see how the numbers work out for you.

bodengroden said:
If I average 50 miles a day (12 kW) is it simply 12 x the rate $0.07 x 30 days = ~$25.2 a month?

One extra twist is that the 5 hours of super off-peak are not enough to fully charge the battery from 0 to 100%. So on days when you drove more than about 70 miles, if you needed a full charge the next day you'd have to do some charging at normal off-peak rates. Probably not an issue if you're usually giving it 80% charge and not pushing the range day after day.

Are you sure about that 50 miles a day? 18,000 miles per year? I looked at my yearly miles driven, subtracted out road trips, and came up with a surprisingly low average daily miles around town.
 
garygid said:
So, you figure that, with "enough" PV over-production, considering the added cost of installing the extra meter, and the (possibly?) extra monthly meter fee, that just staying on the standard whole-house, non-TOU (-D?) rate is best?
IF you have enough over-production (annual net) to cover your EV, then you are better off with a single meter on DR. You can net out $Zero$ for the year, or even get a few pennies back for surplus. In this case, if you opted for the dual-meter (subtractive) Experimental rates, you'd have more overproduction and a monthly bill for the EV use. Even at super-duper-off-peak, it appears the Solar overage wouldn't be paid out at a higher rate, so you'd have to pay the difference. Not a win.

If I was OVER-producing reliably, with enough to cover the EV, I'd stay off the second meter (but still join EV Project).

Conversely, if I am confident that Solar won't cover all my DR use anyway, then I'm certainly better off on the Experimental rates. Assuming I charge off-peak, the electricity will always be the same or cheaper than additional (marginal) DR electricity. If the EV would push you into the 130%+ brackets, then it's certainly a win to go Experimental rate. This is my situation.


Now, the part most people don't know is that you CAN join the EV Project, and decline the second meter keeping the SDG&E arrangement you already have. Then you get the free Blink charger, installation, and data monitoring at the same electric rate you would pay anyway. Worth a thought.
 
stanley said:
GroundLoop, Is Ecotality still accepting applications for free chargers?

YES, in San Diego. I confirmed this on Saturday with Andy Hoskinson at ECOtality.

(LA might be full?)

You must have a Leaf Reserved or Ordered, but not yet Delivered. It must have a DC QuickCharge port (either SL-e or paid for).
Volts are also allowed (even though they don't have a DC port)

You can't apply until your Reservation is in place, and once you take delivery, it's too late. At least, that's how I understood it.
 
Part of the problem of the experimental rates is that while the super off peak is very low and the daytime rate extra ordinarily high, SDGE doesn't credit back PV energy production at the rate when it is produced. So if I'm producing 24kWh of electricity they will only credit me at $~0.10/kWh, not the higher rate being charged to customers actually the energy at the time I'm producing it.

Now that we've been driving the car for a few days our assumptions about when we recharge and for how long have changed a bit- originally we thought that we'd be recharging every other day because we don't do a whole lot driving. But we've found that since it is recommended to only charge to 80% capacity, we are "topping off" every night albeit for only a few hours. So for those that are tied to a five hour super low off peak charge rate you'll probably be fine on a day to day basis (because you aren't charging the car with an empty battery to 100% every night, which takes about 7 hours)

So far our net solar production has been enough to cover our driving and our regular household usage, so we still haven't effectively been charged for any power from the grid yet. YAY!

-u
 
Back
Top