MaximumOtter said:
I have a brand new SL and I am lucky enough to live near a bunch of QC locations in Chicago. Everything I have seen and read says that it will charge up to 80% but I put mine on the charger yesterday and it went above 80%. Am I supposed to monitor it and keep it from going above 80% to avoid damaging it or will it "self regulate".
The car's system has the final say as to how the charging goes, so you're not risking any damage by leaving it connected to a QC. Different models of QC station behave differently; for example, the Blink QC stations prompt you to enter a "when do you want the charge to stop?" value as some multiple of ten percent of ... something, but the Blink overestimates how charged the car is by about 20% (if you want to charge to 80% according to your LEAF's measures, tell the Blink to go to 100%). The Aerovironment stations are simpler: they just keep charging until the car finally hits 100% and shuts itself off, or the driver manually terminates the charge. There are probably other behaviors, too, like "charge for finite amounts of time or max charge reached".
Your expectation that the charge would stop at 80% may have come from the fact that the LEAF's charging system will ramp the charging rate down fairly quickly after the battery reaches 80% (Not too long after that, the charging rate drops down to the equivalent of L2 charging). So in order to be able to promise an attractively short recharging session, the QC performance is stated in terms of how long it takes to charge from empty to 80%. But, as I said, you
can QC to a higher state of charge than that, if you don't mind the speed dropping like a rock.
MaximumOtter said:
On a hopefully unrelated note, my wife drove it today and while it said almost 80 mile range she only drove about 25 in traffic using B mode and econ and the Leaf now says it is down 20.....is this normal?
Can't tell whether you mean that her trip appeared to reduce the "Guess-O-Meter" reading by 20 miles after driving an actual distance of 25 (no complaints in that case, though, right?), or the GOM reading reduced by 20 after driving an unspecified distance at 25MPH, or whether the GOM went from promising 80 to promising only 20 after driving either 25miles or some unknown distance at 25MPH. The "GOM display reduced by 60 miles over an actual 25 mile distance" scenario would be the most worrisome, of course. I'd have to say that was a poor showing even for a GOM. If that promise of 80 came after a prolonged period of regeneration, or the "in traffic" condition you mention means "in snail's-pace stop-and-go traffic, with the heater roaring at near max all the while", or both, it could happen, though.