It is currently Sat Oct 25, 2014 12:45 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:25 pm 
Offline
Forum Supporter

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 2:03 pm
Posts: 7
Well, I thought that the upgrade would improve this "Miles to Go" estimator. But no.

Driving at 35 mph, flat road, no AC or heat, Eco mode, (pretty much best case) I see the "Miles to Go" estimator drop by ~ 2.5 - 3 miles for each odometer mile driven!!

This is in California, 50 F - 65 F. I charge to 80% capacity as recommended by Nissan.

I really don't see why this meter would be so bad! It really should not be so far off. The knowledge of the battery discharge curve is well known, the new software update has been in place for four weeks.

Any ideas? Thanks!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 1:48 am
Posts: 8874
Location: 100 Mile Club San Diego
Leaf Number: 00000
wescom wrote:
Well, I thought that the upgrade would improve this "Miles to Go" estimator. But no.

Driving at 35 mph, flat road, no AC or heat, Eco mode, (pretty much best case) I see the "Miles to Go" estimator drop by ~ 2.5 - 3 miles for each odometer mile driven!!

This is in California, 50 F - 65 F. I charge to 80% capacity as recommended by Nissan.

I really don't see why this meter would be so bad! It really should not be so far off. The knowledge of the battery discharge curve is well known, the new software update has been in place for four weeks.

Any ideas? Thanks!


I had exactly the same thing for the singular time I used the GoM after the update a few weeks ago. Similar conditions to you, absolutely the easiest conditions to make an estimate, and instead, it stuck on 26 miles to go for 6 miles, and then dropped like a rock.

I covered up the GoM again.

_________________
EVRAV4, was PLGS IN (#2244), & PLGIN2 (#20782)

Range Chart
All EV Rally, BC2BC, Mexico 2 Canada, Aug 10, 2014
100 Mile Club + Longest Drive
Next San Diego EVent
Battery Degradation Summary


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:40 pm 
Offline
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 12:09 pm
Posts: 9187
Location: Foothills of Granada Hills, CA
Delivery Date: 01 Mar 2011
Leaf Number: 000360
After a few weeks of driving it over a route I know well and had good numbers for before the latest upgrade, it now appears obvious that the change is that they have shorted the integration period for the GOM. Thus, the GOM numbers now go up and down faster and over a shorter period than they did before.

_________________
Red SL-e with 54K miles/9 bars/195 Gids/46.13 AHr/69% SOH/49.56% Hx on 10Oct14. Ordered 9/1/10 (Fontana Nissan).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 8:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:33 am
Posts: 2943
Location: Shasta County, North California
Delivery Date: 15 May 2011
Leaf Number: 2184
A GOM will never be accurate, until it is designed to estimate future driving.

The LEAFs, will never do that.

IMO, you are wasting your time moaning and bitching,

Use the GOM, for the limited information it provides.

Personally, I am dreading the GOM update, and every future one, since it will never provide any real improvement, only make obsolete the (useful history of driver's observations of) GOM performance, under the previous settings.

_________________
no condition is permanent


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 8:12 am 
Offline
Gold Member

Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 7:43 pm
Posts: 9768
Location: Olympia, WA
Delivery Date: 20 Dec 2013
Leaf Number: 423014
do you realize that no amount of updating will allow it to PREDICT THE FUTURE??

after getting the SOC meter, i really dont look at it so cant say that its better or worse. i do glance at the battery bars occasionally

_________________
44,598 miles on 2011 LEAF (retired) 2013 LEAF;14,388 miles. Ah; 64.24-66.39, Hx; 97.11-102.35% kwh 22.0 @70% estimate; 127,105 miles
Sep 2014 Drive Stats. Corolla;213 miles, $19.20, LEAF;2032 miles $44.78
My Blog; http://daveinolywa.blogspot.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 9:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:06 am
Posts: 2051
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon, USA
Delivery Date: 25 Mar 2011
Leaf Number: 568
They really need to just change it to a % of SOC meter and be done with it... I reset my odometer after every full charge and can do math. :D

_________________
Mikiko (2011 Nissan LEAF ETEC) Status:
Reserved: 04/20/10 | Ordered: 10/01/10 | EV Project Blink Installed: 03/22/11 | Delivered: 03/25/11 | VIN: 568

Oregon Electric Vehicle Association | Electric Auto Association


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 10:29 am 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 11:41 am
Posts: 10573
Location: Seattle, WA
Delivery Date: 25 Feb 2011
Leaf Number: 303
Oh yes - it can predict the future. But for that - one needs to put in the destination and using the geography, traffic conditions Leaf can calculate the range. I guess this will come a few years hence, though. But only because it can't be easily done by a 3rd party now.

_________________
1st Leaf : 2/28/2011 to 5/6/2013
2nd Leaf : 5/4/2013 to ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 10:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 1:48 am
Posts: 8874
Location: 100 Mile Club San Diego
Leaf Number: 00000
edatoakrun wrote:
A GOM will never be accurate, until it is designed to estimate future driving.

The LEAFs, will never do that.

IMO, you are wasting your time moaning and bitching,

Use the GOM, for the limited information it provides.

Personally, I am dreading the GOM update, and every future one, since it will never provide any real improvement, only make obsolete the (useful history of driver's observations of) GOM performance, under the previous settings.



I tend to agree that the GoM will never be accurate, but that doesn't preclude making it MORE accurate than it is. Right now, it's just crazy, even when the existing conditions remain into the future. Thats not predicting the future; just using already established data, that isn't being used too well.

The next generation of GoM (and maybe not from Nissan) will, no doubt to me, include traffic and topography, temp, road conditions, etc, to develop a really plausible range prediction, based on where you tell it you want to go.

There's no technical reason it can't be so.

_________________
EVRAV4, was PLGS IN (#2244), & PLGIN2 (#20782)

Range Chart
All EV Rally, BC2BC, Mexico 2 Canada, Aug 10, 2014
100 Mile Club + Longest Drive
Next San Diego EVent
Battery Degradation Summary


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 1:48 am
Posts: 8874
Location: 100 Mile Club San Diego
Leaf Number: 00000
DarkStar wrote:
They really need to just change it to a % of SOC meter and be done with it... I reset my odometer after every full charge and can do math. :D


To appeal to a mass market, beyond early adopters, many of which hold technical education and jobs, will not be with anything that requires math!!!!

Heck, aren't we some double digit ranking in the world now for math and other sciences, and quickly spiraling down?

My wife, for example, will not do math. Neither will my mother. And limited range vehicles need something beyond a simple gas gauge for mass adoption.

_________________
EVRAV4, was PLGS IN (#2244), & PLGIN2 (#20782)

Range Chart
All EV Rally, BC2BC, Mexico 2 Canada, Aug 10, 2014
100 Mile Club + Longest Drive
Next San Diego EVent
Battery Degradation Summary


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:33 am
Posts: 2943
Location: Shasta County, North California
Delivery Date: 15 May 2011
Leaf Number: 2184
TonyWilliams wrote:
edatoakrun wrote:
A GOM will never be accurate, until it is designed to estimate future driving.

The LEAFs, will never do that.

IMO, you are wasting your time moaning and bitching,

Use the GOM, for the limited information it provides.

Personally, I am dreading the GOM update, and every future one, since it will never provide any real improvement, only make obsolete the (useful history of driver's observations of) GOM performance, under the previous settings.



I tend to agree that the GoM will never be accurate, but that doesn't preclude making it MORE accurate than it is. Right now, it's just crazy, even when the existing conditions remain into the future. Thats not predicting the future; just using already established data, that isn't being used too well.

The next generation of GoM (and maybe not from Nissan) will, no doubt to me, include traffic and topography, temp, road conditions, etc, to develop a really plausible range prediction, based on where you tell it you want to go.

There's no technical reason it can't be so.


If you are willing to input your precise destinations and route, no.

But there is also, not really any reason it should be necessary, to have what will always only be, a more "plausible" range estimate.

It is only the present, very limited public charge infrastructure, causing the present range prediction fixation, of BEV drivers. And having a more precise range prediction, is of no use, if there are no charge points within the variable range.

So, I certainly hope, by the time you get a less inaccurate GOM, you won't need it, anymore.

_________________
no condition is permanent


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Advertise on the forum | Upgrade your account


© My Nissan Leaf Forum - part of the MyElectricCarForums.com Group