maui1 said:
...Does routinely charging to full "waste" kWhs?...
Yes.
In addition to the regen energy loss mentioned when driving from "100%", the battery's
overall trip efficiency is also clearly lower, but without results from the lab, the efficiency losses are difficult to quantify.
We do have OTE data (albeit at unknown temperatures, which is an additional variable) from a "completely depleted to fully charged":
P.21
A) Wall Plug energy 21.722 AC kWh
C) DC energy to pack 18.529 DC kWh
E) DC Test energy * 17.957 DC kWh
Overall Trip Efficiency E/A 82.7%
Analysis Note:
Values are based on
13 level 2 battery
charge events from
completely depleted
to fully charged
http://www.transportation.anl.gov/D3/data/2012_nissan_leaf/AVTALeaftestinganalysis_Major%20summary101212.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
But how much higher OTE is for using less of the pack, not accessing the capacity either at the top or the bottom, has not been reported by the AVTA, nor any other reliable source, AFAIK.
I do 90%+ of my driving in 50-55 mile trips, starting with ~2,000 ft descent (~1500 ft net) and ending with the same ascent, beginning at "80%", and ending anywhere from just before the LBW (in Summer) to just before the VLBW (in Winter).
Charging to "100%" costs me only about ~.6 kWh of regen from the initial descent on each of these trips (this varies by season, and remember, most of my descent energy is still recovered directly, even when I have a
"100%" battery pack) but I find it really annoying to have to use my brake pedal so much.
I can report that I seem to get an additional ~ 2% improved OTE (~85%) on average year round on these trips as compared to the different route (from "100%" to ~VLBW, and only once, all the way to ~
turtle) I use to test my maximum available capacity.
Why
don't you want to set your charge to "80%"?