JasonA
Well-known member
So I heard this tonight and was pretty pissed off! First, the author already seems to have an agenda against EV's by talking about how much greater range the FCHV's have compared to EV's (only 100) and that EV's have slow charging.
2nd, how hydrogen is the "bees knees" and so easy to work with and it's everywhere since water is everywhere :roll: .
3rd, "Without going too deep into the science and engineering" as he goes into none... maybe he should have written on how Shell and Nova produce most of the hydrogen with oil, electricity and from Alcoa in the AU manu process.
I don't want to keep ranting... but here's the article...
http://blogs.kcrw.com/whichwayla/2014/10/californias-hydrogen-dreams
And the audio bit they played on the radio...
https://soundcloud.com/kcrw/californias-hydrogen-dreams
I would suggest to link this and comment on that page...
2nd, how hydrogen is the "bees knees" and so easy to work with and it's everywhere since water is everywhere :roll: .
3rd, "Without going too deep into the science and engineering" as he goes into none... maybe he should have written on how Shell and Nova produce most of the hydrogen with oil, electricity and from Alcoa in the AU manu process.
I don't want to keep ranting... but here's the article...
http://blogs.kcrw.com/whichwayla/2014/10/californias-hydrogen-dreams
And the audio bit they played on the radio...
https://soundcloud.com/kcrw/californias-hydrogen-dreams
I would suggest to link this and comment on that page...
